British comedian John Cleese has taken a serious hit in his recent divorce, though his ex-wife, American psychotherapist Faye Eichelberger, might be laughing all the way to the bank. Cleese, who has no children from this 16-year marriage, has been ordered to pay roughly $13 million in cash and assets, including a NY apartment, a $3 million home in west London, and half a beach house in Santa Barbara. Ms. Eichelberger will also receive about $986,000 a year for seven years, the Telegraph UK reports.Cleese Not Amused by Divorce Settlement
British comedian John Cleese has taken a serious hit in his recent divorce, though his ex-wife, American psychotherapist Faye Eichelberger, might be laughing all the way to the bank. Cleese, who has no children from this 16-year marriage, has been ordered to pay roughly $13 million in cash and assets, including a NY apartment, a $3 million home in west London, and half a beach house in Santa Barbara. Ms. Eichelberger will also receive about $986,000 a year for seven years, the Telegraph UK reports.'Monty Python' star Cleese, 70, is less than pleased about the arrangement, which will ultimately leave his ex-wife the richer of the two. "What I find so unfair is that if we both died today, her children would get much more than mine," he said. "At least I will know in future if I go out with a lady they will not be after me for my money."
Eichelberger sought considerably more. In her divorce testimony, she claimed Cleese was a "world-renowned celebrity" and she was accustomed to "being entertained by royalty and dignitaries in castles". She claimed half the Monty Python star's earnings since their 1992 wedding, half his nine properties, and $1.45 million yearly for living expenses.
Split
The couple, who met on 'Dancing With the Stars' and have been dating for a year, announced their split on Twitter on August 7.
Celebrity Splits
Emmy Rossum and Justin Siegel
Divorcing?
'The Phantom of the Opera' star Emmy Rossum and her boyfriend, music business exec Justin Siegel, called it quits in August 2009. It was reported that the couple had been secretly married, and would now need to file for divorce.
INF
Shannon Elizabeth and Derek Hough
Split
The couple, who met on 'Dancing With the Stars' and have been dating for a year, announced their split on Twitter on August 7.
Jason Merritt, Getty Images
Tracy and Sabina Morgan
Divorcing
The parents of three boys have been married for 23 years, but it's widely believed they've been separated for around eight years.
Mirek Towski, FilmMagic
Johnny Knoxville and Melanie Clapp
Divorced
The 'Jackass' star and his wife ended their 12-year marriage.
Barry King, WireImage
Joe Jonas and Camilla Belle
Split
The 19-year-old singer and 22-year-old actress ended their relationship amicably.
Bauer-Griffin
Demi Lovato and Trace Cyrus
Split
Trace Cyrus says there are no hard feelings between the two, citing distance and age (Cyrus is 20 and Lovato is 16) as the main factors for their split.
Getty Images / FilmMagic
Bianca Kajlich and Landon Donovan
Divorcing
The 'Rules of Engagement' star and her L.A. Galaxy player husband are splitting after three years of marriage.
Getty Images
Lady GaGa and Speedy
Split
The couple broke up after photos of the 'Poker Face' singer surfaced in a British tabloid.
FilmMagic / WireImage
Kim Cattrall and Alan Wyse
Split
The 'Sex and the City' star and her boyfriend of 5 years, Canadian chef Alan Wyse, have parted on friendly terms according to the actress's rep.
Joe Corrigan, Getty Images
Tony Romo and Jessica Simpson
Split
Romo dumped his girlfriend of nearly two years the day before her 29th birthday.
Rob Carr, AP
Director Michael Winner, a close friend of Cleese, said, "It is an extraordinary world which means John is left with much less than his former wife even though he is the star who did all the work. The settlement defies human belief. John is extremely cross about it and I don't blame him. The settlement comes after two years of harrowing legal argument."
Funnyman Cleese couldn't resist a joke, adding, "I got off lightly. Think what I'd have had to pay Alyce if she had contributed anything to the relationship."
The actor said, "In my 70th year, I will still be spending two months a year doing work that is of no interest to me and which is probably slightly spiritually depleting in order to feed the beast."'
- Filed under:
- Highbrow Celebrities -
- Movie News -
- Splitsville
PopStew
SnapPolls
Add your comments
Hot Topics
PEOPLE.COM
FEED- Meet Snooki's New Boyfriend
- Nicole Richie & Joel Madden Celebrate Opening of New Playground
- Movie Wife: Vince Vaughn to Make 'Wonderful Real Husband'
FOX NEWS
FEED- Discovery Channel: 'Deadliest Catch' Captain Dies
- Federal Prosecutors Say ESPN Reporter's Stalker Had Other Victims
- Michael Jackson Balding, Incredibly Thin and Had Tattooed Facial Features
Radar Online
FEED- VIDEO: Ellen DeGeneres Wows In Her American Idol Debut
- Leno's Emotionless Goodbye, For Now
- EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Tila Tequila Says She Has "A Psycho Stalker"
From Our Partner: Dear John
- From the best selling author of The Notebook. Half a world apart. Can love survive?
The Editors
POPEATER HERE, THERE & EVERYWHERE
Sites We Love

- Discovery Channel: 'Deadliest Catch' Captain Dies
- Federal Prosecutors Say ESPN Reporter's Stalker Had Other Victims
- More From Foxnews.com




Comments
(261)Add a comment
Tuesday 18 August
By Glenda
I'm with you, John. Those kind of women make us all look like golddiggers. Luckily, we are not all like that. I believe in 'fair is fair', not "take him for all he is worth (to punish him)".
Reply
Tuesday 18 August
By What Cra
But she believed it was a 'fawlty' marraige.
Tuesday 18 August
By bailoutsos
she was accustomed to "being entertained by royalty and dignitaries in castles" ---- Only because she was married to him, otherwise she would have never been allowed to set foot in those castles.
Tuesday 18 August
By Viktor Capella
There is no way I could ever believe what you claim, all women are guilty unless you are a misogynist.
Tuesday 18 August
By ABS
She claims she deserves the money b/c she needs to maintain the lifestyle that John was nice enough to introduce her to. No children!? How on earth did this judge rationalize this settlement?! As a female, I'm disgusted to see another woman rape a hard working man for WAY more than she deserves. This is definitely a strike for the fairer sex....
Tuesday 18 August
By Laurel
I agree, I don't think that she should get that much money because you don't have children with her but u were together 16 yrs. She doesn't need that much money or the homes.
Tuesday 18 August
By spatterson2326
Geez, how does this women figure she is entitled to so much?? Especially income from his monty python days!! She didn't even know him when he made that series/movies!! Gold digging witch, pay her the amount of savings and income she would have made while they were married if she had gotten off her ass and worked for it! This is the type of women that makes us all look bad!
Wednesday 19 August
By Katie
Unfortunately we will not be privvy to all of the details of their marriage, but it amazes me that just because Cleese said she didn't contribute anything to the marriage that it is assumed she didn't. Also, they were married 16 years. That's a long time when most mercenary women would have popped out a child and headed for divorce court in less than 5 years (ala the ex-Mrs. McCartney). We also have no idea what Cleese did to cause the divorce anymore than we know what his wife did. They divorced, the judge reviewed what went on, and made his decision accordingly. She can claim she's used to the high life all she wants - that's not where the ruling came from. There's more to it that Cleese isn't letting on. He's also into serial marriage. This is his 5th wife. I think he has issues in marriage and he paid this time. Oh Well.
Wednesday 19 August
By Jon Saylor
There are a lot of really good women out there, you sound like one of them, God Bless...
Funny how he still keeps his sens eof humor, Jon
Wednesday 19 August
By Dudley Haas
This is why I love the USA so much. Our laws are by far the fairest and the best. For example, a poor woman marries a rich man for his money. She divorces him and she's rich and then he's poor. It's what we call "spreading the wealth" and once we get medicine socialized, I'm hoping to get the goof ball sized B-9 mole on my 4-head chopped off, and my wrinkled faced wife's prune face lifted. Yep, my bald head is a symbol of our freedoms. I bowled a 297 with it last night in league play!!!Thank God I'm American.
Sunday 23 August
By ltaishoff
This was a settlement, not a judgment after a trial. You have to agree to a settlement; you take a settlement rather than go to trial. If he's unhappy with the deal, why did he agree? Obviously because his lawyers told him he'd get killed on a trial. So now he bellyaches. He should talk to his lawyers, and they will tell him again why he had to take the settlement.
Sunday 23 August
By bailoutsos
He needs to buy toxic assets worth $13 MILLION from a bank for about $5 MILLION and give those to her.
Sunday 23 August
By TIMMAY
It is unfortunate that men of such high prestige and class must tolerate such appaling standards in regards to relationships. It just shows even in the grandest of castles, there is always a trash can. I'm sure he's fired all of his attorneys and might even be having a friend of a friend of a cousin's ex co-worker secretly planning something with a guy probably known on the streets as "Muscle".... Fugheddaboudit.
Tuesday 18 August
By poko
cheaper to keep her.
Reply
Tuesday 18 August
By MJR
just proves , if having kids is questionable or not in your future , it is better to co-habitat at best and "NOT" marry.......or make sure you get that pre-nup agreement.....i'd say live and love , why get married especially if you have money and exposure
Sunday 23 August
By alg2165
Poor Basil. (literaly)
Tuesday 18 August
By Lisa
Should have kept her and became a swinger.
Reply
Wednesday 19 August
By Mike
Can someone please explain this to me. Why is it that in so many divorce cases, the women claim that they were use to a certain lifestyle, and that they are entitiled to continue living like that.
But the man who's life has changed, due to the fact that 99% of the time he looses the home, the kids, and has to adjust to a new lifestyle with less money and more expenses, hence, he has to move into a new home, but it is okay for him to adjust to getting less in life, but the wife is entitled to the same lifestyle. Really unfair system.Laws should be changed.
Tuesday 18 August
By Tazina
Any wealthy celebrity would be a fool to marry these days without an iron clad prenup arrangement. In fact why get married at all if the end result is similar to the beating Mr. Cleese is now being forced to endure. The best idea is two separate residences and skip the piece of paper.
Reply
Tuesday 18 August
By gary
it says "settlement". this means he agreed to it. something is amiss with this story.
Reply