'High Risk' Roman Polanski Loses Bail Bid
Roman Polanski lost his first bid to win his freedom Tuesday as the Swiss Justice Ministry rejected an appeal by the 76-year-old to be immediately released from prison, an official said. "We continue to be of the opinion that there is a high risk of flight," said ministry spokesman Folco Galli, explaining the decision.
Galli told The Associated Press that the risk was too great for the government to accept bail or other security measures in exchange for the release of the filmmaker who is wanted by U.S. authorities for having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.
Polanski was apprehended Sept. 26 as he arrived in Zurich to receive an award from a film festival. Authorities in Los Angeles consider him a convicted felon and a fugitive, and Switzerland says there has been an international warrant out on him since 2005.
His legal representatives are also asking Switzerland's highest criminal court to free Polanski. Galli said the Justice Ministry has submitted a letter to the tribunal explaining why it opposes release even on bail.
Two former Zurich prosecutors have said Polanski stands a minimal chance of an immediate release.
Dieter Jann said extradition would be hard to fight, and he thought Switzerland had followed procedures correctly. Peter Cosandey added that Polanski was unlikely to be released because he is not a permanent resident and had already jumped bail years ago in the United States.
Polanski was accused of plying the underage girl with champagne and part of a Quaalude pill during a modeling shoot in 1977, and raping her. He was initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, child molesting and sodomy.
He pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of unlawful sexual intercourse. In exchange, the judge agreed to drop the remaining charges and sentence him to prison for a 90-day psychiatric evaluation.
However, he was released after 42 days by an evaluator who deemed him mentally sound and unlikely to offend again.
The judge responded by saying he was going to send Polanski back to jail for the remainder of the 90 days and that afterward he would ask Polanski to agree to a "voluntary deportation." Polanski then fled the country, on Feb. 1, 1978, the day he was scheduled to be sentenced to the additional time.
Galli confirmed that Washington has yet to file a formal request seeking extradition. But he said the U.S. probably wouldn't need its entire 60-day period to submit all documents.
"I assume this is a priority case in the United States," Galli said.
Regardless of the court decision, Polanski will likely have to remain in prison for months as his case in the Swiss courts progresses. The Federal Criminal Court has said it will rule in the case in the "next weeks," and a verdict in either direction can be appealed to the country's highest judicial body, the Federal Tribunal.
Galli said the director of "Chinatown," ''Rosemary's Baby" and "The Pianist" would remain in prison for the duration of this process.
Polanski has received backing from directors and film stars in Hollywood and Europe, and from government officials in France and Poland, where he holds citizenship. But some of that support has waned since the original shock of his arrest, with leading French and Polish officials urging a more restrained reaction considering the crime.
In Switzerland, debate has raged among parliamentarians and cultural figures over the neutral country's role in arresting Polanski as he came to attend a government-backed festival. Few, however, have challenged the legality of his imprisonment and likely extradition.
Former Justice Minister Christoph Blocher said last week the director should have been warned - an assertion rejected by legal experts - but added that the case against Polanski now was quite simple and that he "must be extradited."
Polanski and the victim, Samantha Geimer, reached a $500,000 settlement in October 1993, according to documents recently released in Los Angeles.
Geimer, who long ago identified herself, sued Polanski in December 1988 when she was 25 years old, alleging sexual assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress and seduction. She has since joined in Polanski's bid for dismissal and has forgiven him.
2009 AOL LLC. All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.
Add a comment
This piece of crap needs to stay in jail,and all these ppl that think he is so great,why don't they take his place so he can go on making his "masterpieces"...
Reply
The fact that there is even one human being on this planet who thinks he should be set free shows just how low the morals of the country and this world have gone. I am disgusted at the people who think it is forgivable that you get to drug and rape a 13 year old and then be left alone because you've made a few movies....
Reply
I don't think it could be said any better. These supporters....I bet I could guess what their support would be for Polanski if he had done this abominable act with someone in their family or circle of friends. Yes, we are allowed to forgive according to belief in Christ, but I don't believe the punishment should be voided. Someone's little girl was raped, someone's little sister, someone's family circle was attacked viciously...someone's precious, precious innocence was stolen. How can so little concern be given to such an odious and wicked act? Polanski belongs in jail! I can't even understand why he was given any kind of plea deal when this first happened. This makes me sick!
This guy was 'out on bail' once before. Oh, my goodness! It seems back then, when the court trusted him to appear at his next hearing, he simply took off! After all, who could expect a celebrity to comply with pedestrian laws like statutory rape? Flight to avoid prosecution, by the way, is a second independent crime that his over-privileged Hollywood pals haven't really recognized.
Reply
Furthermore, if this creep's Hollywood buddies think that all should be forgotten, they should all be asked how they would feel if it was their 13 year-old daughter that was involved.
Reply
Hollywood celebrities have already been let off the hook in this story. He was at the home of Jack Nicholson and Anjelica Houston when this happened and they were "conveniently out" when he raped the 13 yr old. Anyone who believes that story is an idiot. What about the girls mother who pimped her out? How much money did she get and how did "they" know how to get in touch with her? This is a very dirty story and it involves a lot of people.
Reply
You do not know that the girls mother "pimped" her out - things were different 30 years ago. No one heard of pedofiles, rapists, etc. back then. I am not saying it didn't happened it was just never talked about - it was a totally different era. I believe the first movie about child abuse wasn't even aired until the middle 70's it was called "Something about Amelia." This happened back in the 60's. Women were not even treated as equals during that time.
It's about time he is treated like he deserves to be treated. He is another pedophile, hiding under the disquise as an actor. The same rules apply for everyone. Just because he paid the victim off, doesn't mean he should escape the punishment!
Reply
HIS PECKER SHOULD BE CUT OFF THE LITTLE PERVERT HE SHOVED IT UP HER BUTT WRONG HOLE HE WAS 40 AND SHE WAS 13 I WOULD LIKE TO SHOVE MY FOOT UP HIS AZZ AND SEE HOW HE LIKES IT
Reply
Nancy, apparently (or alledgedly) he didn't pay her. as of like 1996 he was over 600K in debt for the principle AND interest on the 500K payment
Reply
According to my reading of the article, Polanski was originally sentenced to a 90-day prison stay, for a psych evaluation, to be followed by voluntary deportation. He'd already served almost half the original term when he fled the jurisdiction -- thereby putting into effect the main terms of the sentence. So there's all this brou-ha-ha over him being brought back to spend another eight weeks in jail? This sounds to me like a squandering of time and misuse of resources, to redress a violation that has been forgiven by the victim herself. Wasteful and embarrassing.
Reply
How can you say it is a waste of time and money???? He got off lightly in the first place. He should have been charged with taking indecent liberties with a minor, suppling alcohol and drugs to a minor, rape, sodomy as well as being put on a sexual offender registry!!!! He needs to be put back in jail as well as given additional time for fleeing!!! What kind of message exactly do you wish to send to perverts who just happen to have money and/or notoriety? The kid was just 13 years old!!! It is irrelavent that she accepted money in a settlement or that she forgives him.
You have got to be kidding me. So if you commit tthe crime but manage to elude your sentence long enough you should be set free and everything forgiven? Spoken like a true idiot!! I agree with TLM, if you have daughters send them to stay with Polanski and see if he is rehabed...
You, Zimmerman, must be a close relative of the Jew who committed this atrocity. This is the most abominable an sickening act that an old human being (if he can be called that) could impose on a child. If you, Zimmerman, have the guts and believe in Polanski's innocence, ask him to take care of your young daughter for just a few days. Then, if she was unharmed, you can defend him. Polanski must be held in Switzerland until extradited to the USA; anything else is unacceptable. The Swiss will be embarrassed if they let him go free on bail. He would flee, anyway.
Walter Zimmerman I think if you have any daughters you should send them to spend the summer with Roman. It is not just the remainder of his sentence; there are legal repercussions for fleeing the country when you are supposed to be in jail. What country are you from?
Reply
Actually, I am an American, and as such have always thought I might be allowed to express my opinions freely and responsibly, without having to withstand personal assault as a result. I am also a veteran of the US military, honorably discharged with service-connected disability after service during the Vietnam War, and hold both Bachelor and Master of Fine Arts degrees. For what it's worth, I am also a member in good standing of an established mainstream Christian denomination, keep my single-family home in good condition and my lawn neatly mowed. My thirteen-year-old daughters would not attend parties, unchaperoned, at movie stars' homes, or pose for photographers without a responsible adult present at all times.
I maintain that, for a non-capital crime committed over thirty years ago, with a legally-imposed sentence of three months, the current detainment of Roman Polanski is unwarranted. (Whether that sentence was sufficient is not pertinent to the current situation) If the crime for which he has already served half his punishment were of the severity you all seem to think, the intervening years should have been spent creating an extradition agreement with both the French and Polish governments.
Keep him in jail, he did the crime now he must do the time, the rest of his life would be good. What he did to the 13 year old girl was horrific, what he did not get caught for is probably worse. Hollywood lives by its own rules, sick rules, about time he got caught and many more to folow. I konw all about the weirdos in Hollywood and elsewhere, like Spector who finally behind bars, he did that crap with guns all the time. I do not care who you are, how famous or how rich you will get caught, watch over your shoulder for the boys in blue, you will do time eventually.
Reply
I do not understand someone like Polanski. He did not learn a lesson from the horrible slaughter of wife Sharon Tate, child and Sharon's friends. Such horror was done by Manson and Polanski turns right around a few years later to do horror to a young girl by sexual perverted behavior. Rape was bad enough but SODOMY?????????? He derserves all the pain he is receiving and more. I do not feel sorry for Polanski.
Reply