Stephen King is back and ready to make your hair stand on end with 'Under the Dome,' a complex novel about society and humanity with that signature King touch. PopEater is proud to exclusively premierean interview in which King discusses 'Dome.'
"There's a saying that people have in Alcoholics Anonymous, which is, 'You're only as sick as your secrets.' Some of the people in this book are pretty sick indeed, and let's put it this way -- I think readers are going to be engaged, but I don't think they're going to be totally surprised by some of the things people are holding back, because we have them in our own lives," King says in the interview.
See the clip after the jump!
PRODUCTION PLAYER! DO NOT DELETE.
"I saw it as a chance to write about the serious ecological problems that we face in the world today. I don't want to get real heavy about this ... but the fact is we all live under the dome. We have this little blue world we've all seen from outer space, and it appears that's all there is," King says in the interview.
Explaining how the book came to fruition, King says he tried to write 'Dome' in 1976, but that it went on the back burner until three years later -- but even then, King wasn't ready. "It's kind of like a baseball player saying, 'I missed a really fat pitch and I'd really like to have another chance.' "
During a plane trip to Australia three years ago, King nabbed that fat pitch, and the inspiration to revisit the 'Dome' concept returned.
"The image that caught my mind was the idea of these people giving a press conference to the outside world ... and from what you see there's nothing between them and the cameras until somebody reaches out and knocks on, you know, thin air," King explains.
The acclaimed author of more than 50 books says it "was great to be working on a big canvas again," explaining that he ultimately writes "two kinds of books: I do books that are like murals -- they're big and they're populated with all kinds of characters -- and then [I] do the close-up books like 'Misery.' If you're going to write a book that people are going to love ... you just can't phone it in."
The world and the environment was a key factor for King's inspiration, the author says. "I saw it as a chance to write about the serious ecological problems that we face in the world today. I don't want to get real heavy about this ... but the fact is we all live under the dome. We have this little blue world we've all seen from outer space, and it appears that's all there is."
Get info on Stephen King's upcoming comic book project, 'American Vampire,' at ComicsAlliance.
I agree King's 'old' books were great. (The Shining!) But then he went off the edge with stupid scenarios like 'Tommyknockers'... that ended my love affair with King's novels. It seemed he tried to spins crap out as fast as he could, without a lot of depth or even concern with his product. For me, it has to be a little believable, or it isn't fun. And certainly not scary! Hope his new book is the old King.
I agree! When I read his books I can see what he is writing in my head. Only a few authors that I have read (and I read a lot I have over 500 books in my house) have that ability. Can't wait to get this one.
i thot it was just me!!! maybe we've "matured" and the things Mr. King writes about no longer scares us? still and all, i will take nothing from him. when i loved him, I did.
I agree. King's work is excellance. I get what he is saying in his books because I've read them all and I plan on reading this one as well. I don't understand what people mean, "the old King?" His works have always been a stretch of the imagination. I think he is one of the best fiction writers of our time and deserves to be recognized for this.
You are crazy. If an author censored himself, what kind of author would he be? I have no respect for anyone who is afraid of words. If you don't like mature novels, then don't read them. But going online saying he has stooped to a new low is blasphemy. He has been graphic since the 70's.
King took a lot of time off writing because he was in a near fatal accident. At the time he said he might never write again, so I'm really glad to see he's done another book, and one that is predicted to be so good. I've missed reading his "new" books.
I agree! And, if you ever got the chance to meet him--you will find that he is a very nice guy and quite down-to-earth. He is the best and I will continue to buy his books. I have quite a collection.
Mature writing does not mean cram as many four letter words into a book as possible. You can have complex and interesting writing without swearing. It is the sign of a small mind that always has to resort to foul language to express a point. And it's not censoring yourself as a writer, it's finding a better way to tell your story.
wrong wrong wrong, birdge. it's dialogue; it doesn't reflect on King's personality or his skills as a writer, it reflects on the character speaking. I was in my hospital's pediatrics waiting room and a father decided it was okay to drop the F-bomb repeatedly in front of his daughter. if I were to write about the event, would I be considered an immature author because the character used the F-bomb in the course of the story? no. people are vulgar, and King's writing reflects that as he realistically depicts his characters. if a character doesn't speak with proper grammar, it doesn't mean the writer is poor, it just means the writer is aware of how people speak. if you're going to criticize an author's writing, don't criticize his characters or their actions unless the depiction is just plain off.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but King writes fiction right? He is not giving testimony, he is making up what the characters say. I understand if a character's personality warrants course language, but I also think there are ways to portray that without peppering dialogue with swears. From what I remember, King can create extremely elaborate descriptions. So I think he can convey a rough-around-the-edges character without making every other word a curse.
I agree with you, Bob. From what I've heard, the writers do okay when they are first published, but then they get tied to a contract which results in nothing but the author cranking out novels as fast as the contract says. Writing is a mood thing. It's difficult to get into the writing mood when you have a deadline hanging over your head.
I agree completely, Stephen King is my absolute favorite, always has been! I love his style of writing, he has that way of making you see things exactly the way he wants you to. He doesn't just pound out stories as fast as he can, he waits til the stories come to him, a true writer!
Beth, You're absolutely right. The Dark Tower is genius work along with his other stories which work the Tower within. It's good to know there are others who feel the same way.
Sharrie: With all due respect, real people don't say things like, "gosh-darnit! That unpleasant woman killed my baby!' King writes as he always has, with dialogue that rings true. If this type of language offends you, there are plenty of books out there with characters who never face anything that would bring a real, visceral, emotional outburst. Just like changing the channel on the T.V. you have done the right thing to seek out more pastoral reading material. Please don't condemn an excellent author just because all of his characters weren't raised in church.
iagree with Beth-i have loved stephen Kings writing for quite a few years now. I have read all of his books and have all in first editions, except for the first dark tower book. I am very much looking forward to his new book and have ordered it through the publisher-collecters edition of course. He is the greatest! Pam
King didn't stoop low, he was using dialogue that was real to the people he was writing about. If he censored his writing, it would not only not ring true it would be like putting a pair of shorts on Michaelangelo's David -you don't do that to art.
What a silly mommy! Katie Holmes takes Suri into the water in her clothes as the two spend the afternoon at the beach in Miami. More of Today's Hottest Photos
Add a comment
Well said!
I agree King's 'old' books were great. (The Shining!) But then he went off the edge with stupid scenarios like 'Tommyknockers'... that ended my love affair with King's novels. It seemed he tried to spins crap out as fast as he could, without a lot of depth or even concern with his product. For me, it has to be a little believable, or it isn't fun. And certainly not scary! Hope his new book is the old King.
I agree! When I read his books I can see what he is writing in my head. Only a few authors that I have read (and I read a lot I have over 500 books in my house) have that ability. Can't wait to get this one.
i thot it was just me!!! maybe we've "matured" and the things Mr. King writes about no longer scares us? still and all, i will take nothing from him. when i loved him, I did.
I agree. King's work is excellance. I get what he is saying in his books because I've read them all and I plan on reading this one as well. I don't understand what people mean, "the old King?" His works have always been a stretch of the imagination. I think he is one of the best fiction writers of our time and deserves to be recognized for this.
You are crazy. If an author censored himself, what kind of author would he be? I have no respect for anyone who is afraid of words. If you don't like mature novels, then don't read them. But going online saying he has stooped to a new low is blasphemy. He has been graphic since the 70's.
King took a lot of time off writing because he was in a near fatal accident. At the time he said he might never write again, so I'm really glad to see he's done another book, and one that is predicted to be so good. I've missed reading his "new" books.
I agree! And, if you ever got the chance to meet him--you will find that he is a very nice guy and quite down-to-earth. He is the best and I will continue to buy his books. I have quite a collection.
Mature writing does not mean cram as many four letter words into a book as possible. You can have complex and interesting writing without swearing. It is the sign of a small mind that always has to resort to foul language to express a point. And it's not censoring yourself as a writer, it's finding a better way to tell your story.
You would think AOL would care enough to install spam filters. Guess not.
wrong wrong wrong, birdge.
it's dialogue; it doesn't reflect on King's personality or his skills as a writer, it reflects on the character speaking.
I was in my hospital's pediatrics waiting room and a father decided it was okay to drop the F-bomb repeatedly in front of his daughter. if I were to write about the event, would I be considered an immature author because the character used the F-bomb in the course of the story? no.
people are vulgar, and King's writing reflects that as he realistically depicts his characters. if a character doesn't speak with proper grammar, it doesn't mean the writer is poor, it just means the writer is aware of how people speak.
if you're going to criticize an author's writing, don't criticize his characters or their actions unless the depiction is just plain off.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but King writes fiction right? He is not giving testimony, he is making up what the characters say. I understand if a character's personality warrants course language, but I also think there are ways to portray that without peppering dialogue with swears. From what I remember, King can create extremely elaborate descriptions. So I think he can convey a rough-around-the-edges character without making every other word a curse.
I agree with you, Bob. From what I've heard, the writers do okay when they are first published, but then they get tied to a contract which results in nothing but the author cranking out novels as fast as the contract says.
Writing is a mood thing. It's difficult to get into the writing mood when you have a deadline hanging over your head.
I agree completely, Stephen King is my absolute favorite, always has been! I love his style of writing, he has that way of making you see things exactly the way he wants you to. He doesn't just pound out stories as fast as he can, he waits til the stories come to him, a true writer!
How old is your grandaughter? Is she old enough to even read King?
Beth,
You're absolutely right. The Dark Tower is genius work along with his other stories which work the Tower within. It's good to know there are others who feel the same way.
Sharrie: With all due respect, real people don't say things like, "gosh-darnit! That unpleasant woman killed my baby!' King writes as he always has, with dialogue that rings true. If this type of language offends you, there are plenty of books out there with characters who never face anything that would bring a real, visceral, emotional outburst. Just like changing the channel on the T.V. you have done the right thing to seek out more pastoral reading material. Please don't condemn an excellent author just because all of his characters weren't raised in church.
iagree with Beth-i have loved stephen Kings writing for quite a few years now. I have read all of his books and have all in first editions, except for the first dark tower book. I am very much looking forward to his new book and have ordered it through the publisher-collecters edition of course. He is the greatest!
Pam
I jumped off the Kingtrain after "it".
King didn't stoop low, he was using dialogue that was real to the people he was writing about. If he censored his writing, it would not only not ring true it would be like putting a pair of shorts on Michaelangelo's David -you don't do that to art.