Six years after Janet Jackson's breast made a cameo appearance in a Super Bowl halftime show, a federal appeals court is again debating the merits of an FCC fine once dismissed in 2008. The court convened yesterday to discuss whether fining CBS $550,000 for Jackson's seconds-long exposure was legally permissible, reports the Associated Press. The U.S. Supreme Court asked the lower court to consider reinstating the fine, which was originally dismissed as "arbitrary and capricious," but we have our own request to make of our judicial system: let it go.CBS Fighting Super Bowl Nip Slip Fine After Six Years
By Brooke Tarnoff Posted Feb 24th 2010 10:30AM
Six years after Janet Jackson's breast made a cameo appearance in a Super Bowl halftime show, a federal appeals court is again debating the merits of an FCC fine once dismissed in 2008. The court convened yesterday to discuss whether fining CBS $550,000 for Jackson's seconds-long exposure was legally permissible, reports the Associated Press. The U.S. Supreme Court asked the lower court to consider reinstating the fine, which was originally dismissed as "arbitrary and capricious," but we have our own request to make of our judicial system: let it go."The incident, while inappropriate and regrettable, was not and could not have been anticipated by CBS," the network said in a statement. "There are rare instances, particularly during live programming, when despite broadcasters' best efforts it may not be possible to block unfortunate fleeting material."
If you've somehow managed to forget, the incident occurred at the end of a duet between 2004 halftime performers Jackson and Justin Timberlake. As JT sang the words "I'm gonna have you naked by the end of this song," he tore a piece of Jackson's costume, revealing her right breast and a gold, sun-shaped nipple shield.
Breast-Baring Occurs at 5:28 of the Video Clip
Jackson and Timberlake claimed the exposure was accidental -- a claim that gave birth to the now-famous phrase "wardrobe malfunction." We don't buy that for a second. However, CBS immediately cut away from the action on stage; the speed with which Jackson's chest was replaced by an aerial view of the stadium makes us think CBS was not aware of the choreographic particulars in advance.
As CBS said, "inappropriate and regrettable." We think it's uncool that little kids across America saw a flash of unexpected boob. Frankly, we don't think it's that uncool, in the grand scheme of traumatic things kids witness, but we realize it's up to those kids' parents to decide how unwelcome a stranger's breast is in their families. Either way, CBS hit the nail on the head: the Super Bowl is a live broadcast. Unexpected things can, and occasionally do, happen.
The natural result of an outrageously large FCC fine and a few civil lawsuits was the use of a "profanity delay" -- to avoid another scandal that year, CBS employed a tape-delay for the 2004 Grammy Awards. That same year, ABC imposed a video and audio delay on the Academy Awards to protect its audience from any unforeseen obscenities.
So there you have it. Six years have gone by, Janet Jackson's briefly exposed nipple is still wending its way through the court system, and our culturally-significant events are no longer aired live.
And not to put too fine a point on that breast, but if a "won't someone think of the children" sentiment was at the heart of this scandal in the beginning, let's do a little quick math: Any ten-year-old patient enough to sit through Super Bowl XXXVIII and catch a quick glimpse of adult content -- if he even knew what he was looking at -- is now starting to fill out college applications. It might be time to move on.
- Filed under:
- Gut Reactions -
- Highbrow -
- Music News -
- Pop 10 List -
- Sex That's SFW -
- Janet Jackson
celebrity one-stops
-
Jennifer Aniston
Is it Brad(ley) and Jen take 2? Jen was spotted out on the town with dreamboat ...
-
Paris Hilton
After Fairly Legal actress, Sarah Shahi, laid into Paris via Twitter for almost...
-
Kate Middleton
Kate Middleton is officially a princess. She walked the aisle in an Alexander...
-
Denise Richards
According to Denise, she's not sure that her estranged ex is completely sober....
Popeater Hot Topics
FOX 411
FEED- Actor Christoph Waltz rushed off stage after sounds of gunfire erupt at live talk show
- Report: Beyonce pregnant with second child
- Taylor Swift fan arrested for trying to 'visit' her home: How can celebs protect themselves from obsessive fans?
Huffington Post - Entertainment
FEED- Find Out What Beyonce Will Name Baby No. 2!
- SPOILER ALERT: What's Ahead In 'Nikita' Season 4?
- What You'll See When 'The Vampire Diaries' Returns
EW.COM
FEED- EW.com's 4th Annual Season Finale Awards: Nominations wanted!
- Peter Parker with a bong? Joe Casey springs ?The Bounce' ? FIRST LOOK
POPEATER HERE, THERE & EVERYWHERE
Sites We Love

- Actor Christoph Waltz rushed off stage after sounds of gunfire erupt at live talk show
- Report: Beyonce pregnant with second child
- More From Foxnews.com

- Find Out What Beyonce Will Name Baby No. 2!
- SPOILER ALERT: What's Ahead In 'Nikita' Season 4?
- More Stories
Live from Google I/O's 2013 opening keynote!
Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Save on Spring Cleaning With a New Vacuum -- Savings Experiment
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
BBC Host Paula White Pulled Off Air After Sounding Drunk
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions




Add a comment
THEY SHOULD FINE CBS!! ONE OF FOUR BAD NETWORKS
Reply
CBS doesn't need to be fine as you have claim T Rogers you're prude that is out touch. I doubt that you don't watch the major networks anyways since you have said that it was one of the 4 bad networks.
The FCC is useless and needs to get rid of it. I believe CBS shouldn't have gotten fine for the fleeting boob of Janet Jackson I didn't see it live I saw it the next day on the news and I thought then it wasn't a big deal and it's time to move on.
Reply
What hypocrisy!
Where lies Timberlake's responsibilty in all this drama. Folks remember that was the guy that we all saw, who actually ripped the bra off of Janet. He actually had his hands on her and did warn us "he was gonna have her naked by the end of this song". I don't understand why Janet is the one getting all the flack.
Reply
Thank you Chris!!!! But even Timberlake placed all of the blame at the feet of Janet.
This case will continue in the courts until the lawyers have made all the money possible. This is another example of how our legal system is broken and needs reform. Tort reform could save 200 billion in medical costs alone, not to mention costs to businesses who get sued for having hot coffee, etc.
Reply
OK so Janet's boob was wrong on a family show, BUT was it right to have The Who perform this year??? Pete Townsend was charged with Child pornography!!! Yeah he was not found guilty, BUT HE DID ADDMIT TO USING HIS CREDIT CARD TO PURCHASE CHILD PORN!!!! CBS and the NFL need to look at things a little closer....
GREAT FOR A "FAMILY" SHOW.... WAY TO GO CBS/NFL
Reply
i can honestly say that since that performance, the superbowl has never been the same. I remember the half time show being cutting edge and whatever the biggest artists of the year were at. Now its occupied with senior performers that only the baby boomers generation actually want to see. The world needs to get over it because i don't think i've actually watched a whole superbowl since.
Reply
If it was a accident she would not have been wearing a sticker on her boob.
Reply
Who is paying for all the proceedings?
Reply
CBS is responsible and should pay the fine...the intent was clear and a big fine will keep others from doing this again...tits are sex objects...they have 3 to 5 sec time delay for just this thing and should have used it when you have punks such as these on CBS tv............
Reply
You're a prude that is out touch mroneoftheguys. The intent wasn't clear and CBS shouldn't get fine as you have claim which are lies and baseless as well. Tits aren't sex objects again another lie and you support cenorship which is wrong. I'm always right.
Down With Prudes Of America.
Let it go already.
Reply
Their Attorneys are sure making money off of this.
Reply
what a waste of taxpayer money we are paying these lawyers to prosecute this but not the bankers that ruined the economy get over it you didn't see anything you wouldn't see on any beach in the summer fake outrage
Reply
why on earth are we STILL talking about this 6 years later ?!!!! truly the powers that be must not think about the REAL stories that are going on in the world at this very moment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
HOW MUCH OF THE TAX PAYER'S MONEY IS BEING WASTED ON THIS PILE OF CRAP????????????
Reply
I'd much rather have my child ask questions abouat the bare breast than have them ask me "what's erectile dysfunction?". The FCC doesn't have any trouble with the adds for viagra.
Reply
After 6 years you would think any child damaged by the site of a horrible breast would have had enough counseling, so they could now live a some what normal life ! We need to stop wasting all this money going to court, so the up tight right could let their friends on wall street get bigger bonuses .... NOW that is what is disgusting and a TOTAL disgrace to the American people, not some nipple, which by the way, I couldn't even see it happened so damn fast lol. I often wonder how so many of you up tight people manage to even have children !!!!!!
Reply
It's ridiculous! You can't see anything anyway. There was no exposure of any kind - the picture is too far away. If you weren't told what you were viewing, there was no way you could possibly know that it was breast and not even bared from what was said (she had some sore of nipple cover on it. Oh, my gosh!! Did I just say a naughty word?? Shhhhh nipple?? Well so friggin' what!! The concept that this will forever corrupt children is unbelievably naive and idiotic! Go back to your corsets and victorian concepts of righteousness and wallow in self agony of unrelieved sexuality!
Reply