Kim Kardashian Growls Back About Sad Kitten Photo

She's been described as a sex kitten, wears a cat suit and makes most grown men purr, so reality TV starlet Kim Kardashian wants you to be sure she would never hurt any of her feline friends.
"Rest assured, the owner and vet were on set and showed me how to pick him up," Kardashian wrote in a blog post Monday, referring to a photo showing her holding a cat by the scruff of its neck during a
photo shoot. "The cat was not harmed in any way and is perfectly fine! I love animals and would never do anything to harm any animals."
Kardashian's fan base took the prospects of animal abuse seriously, reacting negatively to the image.
Comments ranged from confused ("i hope you was not hurting that poor little kitty. im against animal cruelty," wrote Yanirislove) to angry ("This is really not a nice picture! Do you only think about yourself? You are a beautiful woman from the outside, but by the looks of this picture I am not very thrilled about the way you treat animals," said Shootinbeauty).
Representatives from animal rights groups, who normally police and condemn this type of behavior, muted their normally deafening opposition. They did not believe Kardashian, 29, was intentionally attempting to harm the cat in question. "Kim Kardashian isn't the only person who mistakenly thinks that because a mother cat picks up her kittens by the scruff of the neck that a supportive hand under the rump isn't needed," said a representative from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). "But I'll bet plenty of fans have let her know -- nicely, we hope!" they added.
To clarify the issue, PETA stated that kittens can be suspended by the scruff of their necks, but only for a brief period of time. They did warn, however, that "the manner in which Ms. Kardashian is holding the kitten could lead others to mishandle animals."
Add a comment
OK, IF SHE WOULD NEVER DO ANYTHING TO HARM AN ANIMAL.....WHY DON'T YOU ASK HER ABOUT ROCKY, "HER" DOG!!! SHE HAS ALWAYS CLAIMED ROCKY WAS "HER" DOG, BUT....WHERE IS HE NOW? GO ASK HER AND GET READY FOR HER DISGUSTING RESPONSE!
Reply
I would like to know what happened to her dog Rocky?
Please.....you got me curious now!!!
And why was this pic taken in the first place? Is she advertising a product, other than herself, ofcourse. What does it all mean?
Reply
Seriously who really gives a crap about Kim Kardashian? Over done way tooooooo much makeup and just another over rated hollywood reality tv actress.... I feel sorry for the cat that had to be close to her!!
Reply
Possibly you give a crap??? You responded!!... not so much for the cat, but for the dis of Kim K....ooohhh...."lightbulb"...
I'm facinated that ANYONE would put their personal lives on camera.... for the world to see..seems to be a moneymaker for them though..if THAT is what it is all about..so be it...good for HER! I would NEVAH accept the mistreatment of animals...I saw no mistreatment.....only publicity. Isn't THAT what it is about with them? Sad...
I believe the cat was unhurt..I believe people overreact for their own reasons. Have had cats and dogs my whole life (am 52 now) and picked them up this way numerous times...never a whimper out of any of them...just that unconditional love they give. Much better than humans that way...........I'm just sayin'. I've never had PETA on my butt...but..I've never been in the "public" eye either..maybe THAT is why she has to respond to these ............
Reply
As in John & Kate, the Kardashians need to do an Edward Morrow and sign off. Can't blame Reggie for cutting her loose. She ruined HIS super bowl moment. Enough all ready. Get a job, go to school, do some good for a change instead of posing.
Reply
Just admit you did wrong instead of always trying to justify your stupidity.
Reply
I don't think the cat was hurt. However, for her to say that she would never hurt an animal is a joke. What about all of the fur she wears. That just shows how stupid people are.
Reply
There are people who have to have a "cause"....they HAVE to be attempting to tend to somebody else's business at all times. It gives something to their sad little existence.....
Reply
I guess like you're trying to do to those type of people??
So much of animal sympathy is based in ignorance. This is a good example of it. If this is cruel to a cat, then every cat mother is cruel, both wild and domestic. I have had vets express their preference for this kind of handling of cats. It does NOTHING to harm the cat. Get a grip all you poorly informed knee jerkers. This is a safe and acceptable way to handle a feline.
Reply
It does NOTHING to harm the cat. Get a grip all you poorly informed knee jerkers. This is a safe and acceptable way to handle a feline
Shows you dont know what your talking about.
I'll leave it to you all to duke it out over whether it's the right way or the wrong way to pick up a cat. All I can say for sure is that at one time I must have done it the wrong way because what I ended up with on the end of my arm was a shrieking, spitting, scratching and biting cat. That was about ten years ago when I was 14. Still bear the scars and have never tried to pick up any animal like that again.
Were you a cat in a past life? how would you know?
Kittens can be picked up by the neck but only as a kitten, never a adult cat
Reply
What was she doing with her other hand????Why couldent she use it to hold up the bottom of the kitty? Humm, I just wonder where her hand was?
Reply
I would rather have the Cat then her. Plasto Surgorama, bagnboobs fake person thingie.
Reply
The picture as usual from that family is in poor taste. Other poses could have been shot that would not carry such a angry response from all of us that own pets. Regardless of a vet being on the scene, she chose a pose in very poor taste. By the way I don't eat my salad in a buble bath.
Reply
She would lift her new born nephew by the scruff of his neck to to promote her image. It is just a matter of principle. Some would do anything to make a fast buck while others only allow their principles to guide their judgements.
Reply
Even more frightening is the fact that this washed out 'ho is only 29?! EEEEWWWWW! Kardashians do NOT age well!
Reply