Why I Both Loved and Hated the 'Lost' Finale
Pop-Ed: Sitting down for the 'Lost' finale was a bit like watching an odd hybrid of the Super Bowl mixed with a college graduation. Whether it was feasible or not, I was expecting fireworks, drama, action and answers to life's ... errr, 'Lost's' most troubling questions. Going in, it was obvious that not everything was going to be explained -- that would be impossible given how many dangling mysteries the show's producers have unfurled upon us. However, when the finale answered nearly none of those questions and instead went the heartwarming emotional route, I was left much like the souls of the cast (depending on who you ask to interpret) ... in limbo. Was the finale awesome or upsetting? If you ask me, it was both, with a heavier emphasis on the latter.
For six years and 120+ episodes, 'Lost' fans have been put through the wringer of theological metaphors, are-they-good-or-bad character judgments and some pretty freaking ridiculous diversions here and there. As much as the show's creators like to say it's all about the characters, the show shot to success thanks to the geekery it exuded. Fans hoping that the diversions and random Easter egg moments that peppered the show's existence would be all wrapped up like a nice little present in the finale are surely drowning themselves in Dharma beer today. Why, you ask? Well, mostly because, in the long run, nearly nothing about the vast and numerous intricacies of the Island -- the show's most important and omnipresent character -- were answered.
Remember the four-toed statue? What about the temple? That pool that revived Sayid from the dead? And yes, who can forget the polar bear cameo appearance way back in season one? Those all went to the wayside as the show came to an end. We were told that Jacob, Jack and others had to protect the Island, but we never really learned why. Yes, the illuminated cave (which, if you ask me, is a cheap rip of the 'Pulp Fiction' briefcase) represented the good of man ... so why was it held together by a hieroglyphic-strewn stone carrot that Desmond and Jack could easily unplug? This Island is protecting the human race from evil, and the only thing holding it together is a glorified wine cork? What was it about the Island that made it so damn special? What was Richard Alpert's role? That's what I wanted to know.
When it was announced that the finale had been bumped from two hours long to two-and-a-half, I thought to myself: "Excellent, they're tacking on 30 minutes so that they can
really get to the bottom of things." 'Lost' generally never upset with major episodes. The pilot of the series is probably the most enthralling opener of any series to ever be broadcast, and nearly every season finale or opener has delivered, no questions asked. This time, not so much. While the extended episode wasn't entirely wasted, it certainly could have been managed more efficiently.
For instance ... how did Vincent the (adorable) dog suddenly come back into the storyline, nuzzling up against an about-to-die Jack? Sure, it was touching and emotional, but why? Where was WAAAAAALT? Early on in the show, Walt and his animal-whisperer mystique made him seem like he'd be an important player -- if not The One -- in the show's grand scheme. Forget that. Also, who the heck is watching Aaron and Jin and Sun's baby? Oh, and that minor plot point about that thing called the Dharma Initiative -- what was that about, ultimately? Farraday cracked the time travel conundrum? Great... let's move on. What did it all mean?
Well, now nothing, because the show is over and those questions weren't important enough to answer.
Now, on to the good. The fight between Jack and Locke was pretty flawless, beginning almost as an homage to old kung fu movies, complete with a long-distance stare down and Jack seemingly flying to deliver the first blow. It seemed as though Jack was a goner after taking a gnarly stab wound, but Kate -- who in the past episode made it clear she was hellbent on killing Locke -- came through with the shot heard 'round the 'Lost' world.
I also loved the remembrance-via-touch illuminations that all of the characters had in the flash-sideways segments. Sawyer and Juliet were downright tear-inducing (despite the corny snack machine metaphor) in their connection, and if you didn't feel that, then you should probably check your pulse. No matter what type of strained chemistry Jack and Kate had, the Sawyer-Juliet romantic arc always rang true, and their reborn chemistry was one of the finer moments of the finale. Seeing them back together along with Charlie and Claire tugged on the lovey-dovey heartstrings of everyone watching, and it was done perfectly: It was blunt, quick and passionate.
Another highlight was the redemption of Ben Linus. Through the course of the series, Michael Emerson nailed the role so well that actors for generations to come looking to play manipulative/creepy/diabolical characters will study his work as Ben Linus. Ben did nothing but connive, murder and backstab during his time with the Oceanic 815 crew, so to have him turn to the good side at the end -- while I and likely everyone else were waiting for him to kill everyone in glorious fashion (which would have been pretty fantastic) -- was a nice, unexpected touch, and it turned one of the greatest villains in television history into a hero.
Now, on to the end ... which is what everyone will remember the finale for. Jack has always felt he was living in the shadow of his dad. In fact, nearly everyone on the show had some sort of mommy or daddy issues, but Jack's rocked him to the core. He was a good dude, but his bad dad's legacy was too much for him to overcome. So, with the passing-of-the-torch scene in the church at the end, when Christian tells Jack that his entire life was essentially a test and that he passed, redemption rang throughout the 'Lost' world. The show, it turns out, was essentially all about Jack and his struggle to find salvation. Everyone else was simply a tool or supporting character in 'Jack' ... sorry, 'Lost.' And, like a poetic bookend, the show ended with Jack's eye closing, six years after it began with his eye opening. We should've known all along.
So, while Jack found his path and everyone was reunited in a pseudo-Heaven, 'Lost' adorers around the world were forced to make a decision: Did I want lots of answers, or did I want the overriding theme of the show (finding the good in man) and its main character (Jack) to succeed? On the balance scale of television expectations, that's a call for every viewer to weigh. If you ask me, though, throwing the answer-seekers a bone in lieu of the hokey all-faiths religious redemption wouldn't have been a bad thing.
http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&id=885266&pid=885265&uts=1274711608
http://www.popeater.com/mm_track/popeater/music/?s_channel=us.musicpop&s_account=aolpopeater,aolsvc&omni=1&ke=1
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
'Lost' star Evangeline Lilly is seen here flashing her Hollywood smile at the 'La Princesse de Montpensier' screening at the 63rd Cannes Film Festival on May 16. More Pics of 'Kate' >>>
AFP/Getty Images
AFP
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
Evangeline Lilly attends the 'The Princess of Montpensier' Premiere held at the Palais des Festivals during the 63rd Annual International Cannes Film Festival on May 16, 2010 in Cannes, France. 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "The Princess Of Montpensier" Premiere Cannes, France May 16, 2010 Photo by Jean Baptiste Lacroix/FilmMagic.com To license this image (60469367), contact FilmMagic.com
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
CANNES, FRANCE - MAY 16: Evangeline Lilly attends 'The Princess Of Montpensier' Premiere at the Palais des Festivals during the 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival on May 16, 2010 in Cannes, France. (Photo by Eric Ryan/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Evangeline Lilly
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
©AXELLE/BAUER-GRIFFIN.COM 63rd Annual Cannes Film Festival - "La Princesse de Montpensier" (The Princess of Montpensier) Premiere. Palais des Festivals, Cannes, France. May 16, 2010. Job: 100516A3. www.bauergriffin.com www.bauergriffinonline.com Pictured: Evangeline Lilly.
Evangeline Lilly Snapshots
Add a comment
The fact that we are still all talking about this, after the fact, just shows how good of a finale it was. I don't think Jack died in the original crash, and clearly the sideways story was everyone's "ideal" life - Sawyer was a good guy, Claire found a family, Locke was happy and surgery restored him, Linus was a great guy. The sideways story was how everyone was imagining their lives to be while they waited for others to join them in "limbo" or whatever you want to call it. Jack's limbo story wasn't ideal because Jack was yet to die. Perhaps the island generated what was in the minds of the people who crashed there - the smoke monster was someone's nightmare, the eternal light was someone else's, time travel was another person's. Maybe the island made things manifest so that people could be tested for their allegiance to good or evil? In which case Linus failed miserably until the very end. Honestly though, I didn't want to break my TV at the end of it, and that meant they did a good job and I'd love to buy the soundtrack, the music was awesome!!!
Reply
I like your posting.
I hated the show last night. Cried and Cried, but didn't like not having an answer to the island and the numbers and whitmore and dharma.
But as i read all these I am feeling better...your thoughts are the most well put for me.
THANKS
Reading this is a total waste of time. The person who wrote this does not know anything about LOST. Like polor bears, it was explained with the Dharma Zoo (AKA the cages that Sayer and Kate were locked in by the others). And final scene with Vincent and Jack that was Lost's first scene which at the beginning Jack opened his eyes and the final Jack closed them and died. There have been other thing this person got wrong about lost but after reading half of this article I got pissed and started typing.
Reply
Whatever people.....I guess Claires baby must have died in infancy if they are in there youthful bodies at the end, they died in the plane crash, Christian said it was "real" just because it isn't in this current life doesn't mean it wasn't real. Jack died a few minutes after everyone else. In the afterlife there is no sense of time. Plus Vincent was still a pup.
Reply
Just because Aaron was a baby in Jack's afterlife doesn't mean he died as a baby, it was how Jack would have remembered him and Jack would have never remembered Aaron unless he survived the plane crash because he would have had no idea who the hell Aaron was!!! He would have never known Claire was his sister, would have never met Kate, etc. so there would have been no reason for those people to be the individuals waiting for him in the afterlife therefore defeating the whole purpose of Christian and Jack's conversation.
I guess it was just me, but it seemed like they answered most of the questions, albeit obliquely. The Island turned out to be a psychic projection mechanism that Jacob and the Man in Black had inadvertently used to turn the world into an adversarial, dualistic place, and the castaways succeeded in changing the template to one rooted in togetherness. The application of this theory explains everything from Walt to the Dharma Initiative. Am I crazy? Haven't Lost theorists been suspecting something like this since season 2?
Reply
Yes and the writers said they weren't doing a "limbo", "after life", story. I wasted 5-6 years of my freakin' life, just to watch a theory that I had play out! I am pissed! I was dupped! I knew it couldn't be anything other than some kind of limbo crap! Well, all that said, I am looking forward to watching seasons 1-6 again. I'll be saying, "I can't believe this crap" the whole way through.
to deb: did the writers say that the Island wasn't an afterlife or that none of the show was an afterlife?
I saw an interview where they said that they weren't answering questions about future episode, but they said a few things that it definitely wasn't. I heard them say the "Island" was not an afterlife/purgatory, but nothing about it not being anywhere in the script of the show. but correct me if i'm wrong, and if you have a link to evidence please reply with it.
deb, the island wasn't a "limbo" or "afterlife," only the sideways world of the final season was a limbo/afterlife kind of place. Everything on the island actually happened.
I thought the whole side story, where everybody lives happily ever after, versus the ending where everbody's dead, was a cop out. And what happened to Michael and Walt? I liked it up to the "Ghost Whisperer" ending where everyone moves up to heaven. Boo
Reply
This is for Deb If I read what you wrote right I agree 100% the show was a piece of shi- that let us believe there was a reason behine it .It is called keep watching so we can make money It made no sence and it never did.
Maybe, I need to watch the show again because I was totally confused.
Reply
Indeed there were unanswered questions but so is there right now in everyone's lives. The finale was so emotional and seemed to provide viewers with closure. Remember, "And in the end, the love you make is equal to the love you take".
Reply
Totally agree with Nancy!!!!!!
Reply
I was fine with the premise that everything on the island actually happened. That they needed to move on together.That would be a good reason for Ben to lag behind because he is just begining to work things out with the people important to him.
(Alex and Rousseau)Same thing with Richard he needs some closure with his 17th century wife. Etc.
And then Bonbon reminded me. In the final scene VINCENT WAS A PUP!! No way to explain that other than they all died in the crash.
Reply
What are you talking about? Vincent was never a puppy! At the beginning or the end.
Michael died on the Freighter as in one of the whispers in the jungle. The reason we did not see Walt is that he is still alive. The plane crash was real and Michael and Walt left the island when Ben gave them the boat. If the plane crash was not real then why were thier lives drwan together. You do not spend eternity with a total stranger you sat with on a plane. They all spend eternity together because that was the defining moments of their lives. As far as Alpert, Miles and Lipidus I really dont have a clue Any suggestions
Reply
I hated the ending. I loved Kate with Sawyer, she had NO chemistry with Jack and the same went for Sawyer and Juliet. They had NO chemistry either, she belonged with Jack.
Was the sideways life real or fake??? The ending disappointed me.
Reply
I didn't even watch the finale... and I'm kind of glad, because I definitely would have been beyond confused lol... but I agree about Jack/Kate/Sawyer/Juliet. I LOVED Jack/Juliet, Kate/Sawyer were *hot*, Sawyer/Juliet were just kind of okay and boring, and Jack/Kate truly sucked.
Jack/Sawyer were great, though ;)
Question: If Locke (as the reincarnated Smoke Monster) had to have Ben stab Jacob to death because he could not, how then was he (Locke/Smoke Monster) able to stab Jack (who is now like Jacob) to death? And how was Kate able to shoot Locke/Smoke Monster with a bullet and ultimately kill him, when Sayid was unable to stab Locke/Smoke Monster with a large knife? Please, help me understand!!
Reply