Madonna's foray into fashion with her daughter has hit a sudden snag.Madonna had partnered with daughter Lordes Leon to launch the Material Girl juniors line in partnership with Macy's earlier this summer. According to our partners at RadarOnline.com, the California-based clothing manufacturer L.A. Triumph slapped Madonna with a lawsuit on Aug. 19, claiming it's been using the registered Material Girl name on its own juniors clothing range since 1997, selling the goods in big retailers such as Nordstrom.
In court documents posted on Radar, L.A. Triumph says,"Between 1997 and present day, L.A. Triumph and its predecessor have sold millions of dollars of the Material Girl brand of clothes in commerce throughout the United States and have spent large sums in its promotion and advertisement."
The papers go on to explain that Madonna "improperly filed a United States Trademark Application for the Material Girl mark" in December 2009 and that the pop star's brand is now directly competing with -- and threatens to eclipse -- L.A. Triumph's label of the same name.






What Happened When Alex Kenjeev Paid His Student Loan in Cash
The Richest Woman in the World: How Gina Rinehart Earns her Billions
Preserve Your Budget by Freezing Foods -- Savings Experiment
First Woman To Command A Warship In Royal Navy History
'American Idol' Changes Record Contract Policy: Runner-Up No Longer Guaranteed Major Bucks
Grieving Pit Bull Refused to Leave Dead Companion's Side
It's Legal To Shoot And Kill Animal Poachers, Indian State Orders
Jennifer Lopez, Casper Smart TV Show: J.Lo to Star in Reality Series With Boyfriend (REPORT)
Safeway Worker Stops Man From Beating Pregnant Woman, Gets Suspended
Fired For Being 'Too Hot,' What Happens Next?





Add a comment
Maybe she should have had Material Girl Copyrighted when she did the song.
Reply
I know we men have lots of standards to pick up a woman, and there’s one website that can almost meet all our different demands:
(((( D i a m o n d K i s s i n g . c-0-m )))) my bros told me this; it worked for them, it worked for me; and i’m sure it’s gonna work for u, buddy!! ;)
I know we men have lots of standards to pick up a woman, and there’s one website that can almost meet all our different demands:
(((( D i a m o n d K i s s i n g . c-0-m )))) my bros told me this; it worked for them, it worked for me; and i’m sure it’s gonna work for u, buddy!! ;)
I know we men have lots of standards to pick up a woman, and there’s one website that can almost meet all our different demands:
(((( D i a m o n d K i s s i n g . c-0-m )))) my bros told me this; it worked for them, it worked for me; and i’m sure it’s gonna work for u, buddy!! ;)
Try it now...GAGAGAGHA
sjhdj
This will be a sticky lawsuit.
Madonna's original song didn't say that she was "the" material girl...the lyrics say that she is "a" material girl. Big difference.
And I never actually heard Madonna herself say she is the material girl, but I heard the media use it often when referring to her. And I'm not sure how long after the song came out when they started calling her that, but she probably should have gone for copyright at that time, because that ended up being the title that stuck with her.
Reply
i always thought that marilyn monroe's estate should have sued the POOT out of madonna!
Reply
While never a fan of Madonna's, I did sort of admire her business sense........how could she have been so dumb?? She needs to fire her lawyers or whomever did the research on the use of this name....if indeed anyone researched anything!!! As for the user who says Monroe's estate should sue her, for what? just because she copied a musical number of Monroe's for one of her videos? Nothing unlawful about that; just the sincerest form of flattery!!!!!!!
Reply