Is Rachel Zoe Expecting Her First Child?

By PopEater Staff Posted Oct 12th 2010 04:00PM

Rachel Zoe's life has been bananas. Since parting ways with assistant Brad Goreski, there have been unconfirmed reports that the 39-year-old stylist and husband Rodger Berman are expecting a baby. The couple have yet to confirm the news.

The couple's decision over whether this was the right time for them to have a child was a major topic on this season of her Bravo reality show, 'The Rachel Zoe Project.'

"Rachel isn't getting any younger and I'm starting to feel like if we don't get on it, we'll miss the opportunity, which would be a complete shame as I know that Rachel would make an amazing mother," Berman wrote on his bravotv.com blog on Aug. 10.

According to OK! magazine, who first reported the story, Zoe is three months pregnant. The mag also claimed the couple is "overjoyed" by the news and that Zoe will take maternity leave from full-time styling following next year's Oscars. But the story is no longer on OK!'s website.

The couple started dating 19 years ago and tied the knot in 1997.

Follow Us on Twitter Friend Us on Facebook

Tags: rachel zoe

Comments

(17)

Tuesday 12 October

By bublerocks

Lowest Rank Vote down Vote up Report this

39? Yeah sure right... Expecting a baby?

By Rose

High Rank Vote down Vote up Report this

You are obviously a guy. Some women have no problem having kids into their late '40s--some can't do it even at 20.

By Nico Toscani

I'm guessing they think she's actually over 39. That is an accurate age, even though she looks 60. In the words of Rick James: "Cocaine is a hell of a drug".

Wednesday 13 October

By GAEL

Vote down Vote up Report this

I love Rachel but hate seeing her bones sticking out of her chest, she doesnt look attractive, she looks sickly. I would think that this will affect her pregnancy and hope her doctor makes her gain some much needed weight.

By islandwalker

She knows you have to gain weight to carry a baby right?

By pasha

Highest Rank Vote down Vote up Report this

Good for them! Congrats if it is true.

By mitivolvo

yuk...... who would touch that skinny skank.

By Courtney

she's not confirming it because she's had a miscarriage before and scared to go through the same thing again as at her age it's harder to conceive and have a healthy baby. so she knows that this is a blessing though actual stars have had children at her age and older for decades. Patricia Neal had her 5th child at 39 in 1965 of course she was never as skinny as Rachel is notorious for being even with drinking and smoking including while pregnant of course those were the days when doctors didn't tell you not to do those things while pregnant. of course having a first child at that age is more dangerous than having a fifth sixth what ever.

By Tammy

she needs to gain some weight first

By letmay8

She looks old to be pregnant.

By KS

Who??

By Denise

Just what the world needs...another crack baby.

By notjeff

I think you got her age mixed up with her weight. Her husband hopes to raise the baby with his boyfriend. And a fetus can't survive on cocaine and cigarettes.

A baby can survive and thrive in utero and after birth with a mother that smokes while she's pregnant. my mother did and none of my problems are Corolated back to it I wasn't born premature nearly 2 weeks late infact nor was I under weight like you would expect the baby of a smoker to be I was 7lbs 11oz and 19 5/8 inches long. why don't we stay off of Rachel's case she'll admit the good news when she's ready granted I was born before my mother turned 23 so it's totally different than having your first kid at 39 look at Michelle Duggar had her 16th would've been 17th child at 39 and has had 3 since of course that's from 17 pregnancies at 2 of those resulted in Twins and one ended in a miscarriage due to use of birth control while pregnant.

By Dyanne

Rachel has way to many wrinkles to be 39. I am 52 and look much younger than her. And girl........ gain some waist! You look like hell.

By Roberta

Pregnant? Oh, God, I hope not. On an episode of her show, she had gowns worth thousands of dollars hanging from a closet-pole. The pole was so low, the gown bottoms puddled on the floor like drapes. Her studio flooded from rain during the night, and these gowns were ruined. That was the last episode I ever watched. Trust her with a baby? She's not smart enough to hang up a dress the right way. She's just another celebrity airhead who is not fit to raise a child.

Thursday 14 October

not all celebrities are airheads nor unfit to raise children. give Rachel a Chance that insident with the dresses might have been a fluke. most modern day celebrities count too much on Nannies to look after their kids anyway and never admit to feeling bad about it. like some oldtime stars have over the years since their children grew up like for example Patricia Neal or Joanne Woodward granted stylists are behind the scenes and those examples were major academy award winning actresses and not only that close friends for many decades even having their youngest daughters 3 1/2 months apart in 1965 Correct Paul & Joanne's youngest Claire Olivia was born April 21st 1965 and Roald & Patricia's youngest Lucy Neal was Born August 4th some six months after Pat suffered a series of strokes. lets leave Rachel alone she's scared to confirm it because of previous history

Page 1 of 1