Another day, another false story surrounding Jennifer Aniston. The rumor mill was working overtime yesterday with claims that the actress was adopting, but there is no truth to the reports, according to Gossip Cop.Stories started popping up yesterday with reports that Aniston had visited an orphanage in Tijuana and decided to adopt a baby.
Details about a $250,000 "gender-neutral" nursery in the actress's home started to come out as well, including the name of a celebrity nanny who the actress had reportedly hired. Courteney Cox's former nanny, Marva Soogrim, was reported to be Aniston's new nanny.
A rep from the actress, however, was quick to kill the rumors, telling Gossip Cop that the story was "fabricated."





Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Taylor Swift Q and A: What Does She Splurge on in Las Vegas?
Ricardo Cerezo, Facing Eviction, Finds $4.85 Million Lottery Ticket
MIT's cheetah robot runs faster, more efficiently, can carry its own power supply (video)
Forever 21 Worker Fired After She Tells Her Traumatic Story




Add a comment
Why wont the people leave this woman alone. She is a good actress and one of the best looking women in hollywood. Also probably make a good mother.
Reply
A good actress???? You're either smoking something potent or you're a friend of this bimbo
They have been doing this for years, leak out a lie then deny it just to get the media's attention. This is getting so lame.
To bad her movies can't get her the attention she crave.
Good actress; have you seen any of her stuff. She is a very bad actress. The only thing she has is that body of her. Why do you thing they put he in skin tight stuff; to show off her personality; no its her boob buttons.
She really is not that attractive either with that long face of her.
I so agree. Leave her alone. She seems like a really great person. Don't know why the press wants to constanly put her in a bad light.
twit
I agree with randy. Just still feel sorry for her because I think she's still not over Brad. After all, they were together for years and were MARRIED when Angelina stepped in. Still feel Jennifer and Brad were more suited. We'll see what happens in the future.
.....if Elton John can be a Mom why not Anniston??
A GOOD ACTRESS??? THAT'S WHY HER MOVIES ARE ALWAYS A BUST.
You are not too bright...are you? She pays a lot of money to the firm that keeps her in the public eye.....
Way overrated for way too long. Of course she's not adopting, she seems much too self centered.
Reply
Nailed it correctly....and ENUFF of the pity party cuz Brad went elsewhere for what she obviously lacked !! SHE did NOT want "children", Brad did and was indeed a contentious point that did have much to do with them splitting !! Takes TWO to align or MIS-align. Jen is still in her preferred bubblized version world but it has indeed worn thin and NOT up to her great expectations !! She really does need to find a way to move on and beyond HER past choices...time is awasting !!! But again, her choice to cling to the past of what COULD have been (a her small legion of diehard fans need to grow up a bit as well as they cling to many false notions that ONLY she was betrayed/etc /etc/etc !!!She HAS been savvy enough to milk it thru these past years but has shown she is NOT quite the talent folks attempt to subscribe to her !! Just another tv'd celebrity who was fortunate enough to cash in on such !!)
I have never seen a Jennifer Anniston movie. No particular reason, but I am just not into "chick flicks". I am sure for the type of movie she makes, she is good in them.
As far as her being a Mom, more power to her. I think she would be a great Mom, so if she adopts or has a bio baby, good for her!
Reply
People, she isn't adopting a child, why do you think Brad Pitt left her?? Do the math, he has 6 kids now, she still has none. COuld it be she doesn't want a kid to interfere with her "Career"? Motherhood? I don't think so. Bad for the figure.
Reply
Wow brn7480, is Brad Pitt that shallow,that he would leave someone because they did not produce an offspring? Should all of the men out there who have a wife that do not produce an offspring leave? I have a friend of mine who can't physically have a child. I don't see her husband leaving her for a bimbo because she didn't give him a child. So your statement actually says that if a woman doesn't produce a child, she should not be married! Biy did you open a can of worms~!
best thing that ever happened to her "career" was when Pitt left her for the other bimbo...if that hadn't happened she would have been toast a long time ago.
I'll adopt Jennifer!!!
Reply
i am so over hearing about herrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. just go away big chin fake over paid over exposed wanna be actress jennifer....ughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Reply
So why are you reading about her?
Every story put out their about her is a publicity story. Shes full of herself, thus NO time for a child. Brad was smart to dump her ugly butt. ME ME ME seeps out of her pours. Shes an older version of the Kardashian mess. LOVE ANGIE. now thats a celebrity,star and icon. poor jen, all alone with her puppy and old hag friend courney.
Reply