Kim Kardashian's W Magazine Photos Made Her Cry

Sunday's episode of 'Kourtney & Kim Take New York' showed constant cover girl
Kim Kardashian upset over her
nude W magazine spread from October 2010.
Kim was beside herself after seeing the photos, insisting she'd been promised something more artsy, less "full f***ing porn."
"Oh my God, I'm more naked than I was in Playboy," cried Kim, who has expressed
regret over her Playboy experience. "I'm so mad right now! She promised I would be covered with artwork. You can see nipple. The whole concept was sold to me that nothing would be seen."
See the clip after the jump.
Kim felt "taken advantage of" and learned her lesson, vowing: "I'm never taking my clothes off again, even if it's for Vogue."
The Hollywood Gossip weighed in this morning, writing, "While I get that Kim was embarrassed that the 'art' promised to cover her naked body wasn't delivered, I have to wonder if she and the editors were on the same page. Wouldn't you want it made crystal clear (and in writing) that you are only going nude for this high-fashion magazine if objects were covering your girly bits?"
Despite the emotional toll the photos took on Kim, she came around by the magazine's release, saying, "I'm glad I did them."
See the W photos that caused the ruckus, and watch PopEater's latest interview with Kim and Kourtney:
Add a comment
She crashes EVERY red carpet to be in front of the camera. I felt soooo sorry for Reggie when she barged in on his interview after winning the game of his life. It's all about Kim. Well, maybe 90%. Don't forget 10% goes to Mom who didn't mind posing spread eagle with 5 inch heels on. They are all phoney baloney Seacrest puppets.
When you you make yourself vulnerable by taking all of your clothes off, you more than likely will be taken advantage of.....
Reply
I bet she plays a MEAN rusty trombone--SKANK
Reply
Ya know, if you're dumb enough to take all of your clothes off and let people take photos, you have not right to be upset when they show up. Same goes for letting ANYBODY film you doing your bedroom antics.
This whole family is such a bunch of dummies!
Reply
when you take off your clothes for pictures/video and someone "promises you" your an IDIOT!
Reply
PO LIL HO......go away....PLEASE.....america is pleading with you...do something useful in your pathetic sloritch life and do something for your country.what must little girls growing up think,this is what its all about?....i could friggin cry.
Reply
KIM IS SUCH A FAKE. SHE ALWAYS WANTS SOMEONE TO OOHHAHHH OVER HER OR GIVE HER A PITY HUG. THE WHOLE WORLD SEES WHO SHE REALLY IS THRU THE LENS OF "MANY" CAMERAS. AND SHE WONDERS WHY SHE CAN'T KEEP A REAL RELATIONSHIP! HONEY YOU ARE NO MORE THAN A NOTCH ON A MANS BELT, BEEN THERE DONE THAT.
Reply
W, you should be seriously ashamed of yourselves for publishing such pornographic pictures. Yes, W, they ARE pornographic!!! No media outlet should ever print such pictures - EVER! They are not only in bad and poor taste, they are pornographic! And Kim, you may have been upset about the pictures before they went to print but you made the choice to degrade yourself and let yourself be taken advantage of - you seriously need to take a step back and rethink your priorities, and for God's sake, stop stripping off your clothes every time someone throws money your way!
Reply
The magazine is paying homage to american conceptual artist Barbara Kruger.
Reply
yes she can call it anyway she wants ...its porn ...not art...she loves her body and you can tell "its all about her " shes really beautiful but its pictures like this that cheapen her we do see enough of her body and hear enough of her name ... she has what is "beauty" but using is in the wrong way ... she cried on the show but when she saw herself ..it all changed and she called it ..beautiful..AND then she smiled ..again she loves herself.. shame shame to put this out there on magazines for all the world to see ..this is why theres so mush innocence lost with young girls and sad to say sickos that stalk ..REALLY KIM ?
Reply
What the hell is she crying about..she was totaly nude when she was standing in front of "strangers" I'm guessing, so what the hell did she expect??? If they were going to cover her up in art then she wouldn't have to been totaly naked, is she really that stupid? Even when I was in my 20's I never had a body like her's, boy why nature is so much more kind to some people over other's?
Reply
That girl loves to take her clothes off, she also seems a little sleazy on the show, she hops in bed with alot of guys it seems!
Reply
NOW Kim has regret. She should have thought about the consequences of her actions BEFORE she did something stupid like posing naked. It's called "being responsible".
Reply
Why is PopEater OBSESSED with this pig? They have 2 "exclusives" on "it" on the same day?
Reply
Duh, why would she get nude and pose for pictures then be surprised. She's so stupid!
Reply
I actually have that magazine, and I thought the photos were beautiful. I couldn't believe they were full naked with just silver paint, but nontheless, they were beautifully taken. I did however put that magazine up so my preteens wouldn't see it.
Kim, You looked beautiful...
Reply
THEN WHY DO YOU KEEP TAKING YOUR CLOTHES OFF, A LITTLE OR A LOT. My goodness girl, you are stupid at somethings. Your famous for nothing and yet you keep taking it off, Hello, something is wrong here. Then you cry get upset, but that is all you know how to do. YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW, AND YOU MADE YOUR OWN BED, you can only cry foul once, remember Peter and the wolf.
Reply
Boohoo, poor Kim. I feel so not sorry for the dumb b***h.
Reply
I don't get why people support her, they made her rich for nothing. Stupid society.
Reply
yeah she's crying real hard in pics huh?crying to bank
she can claim what she wants but a zebra is still a zebra even if you paint the stripes
Reply