Royal Weddings Through the Years
Prince William and Kate Middleton will marry on April 29 at Westminster Abbey. Catherine, as she is now known, has not yet revealed who will design her wedding dress, but William is expected to follow royal tradition and wear a military uniform. Since so many Britons are going through economic hard times, there's talk the royal newlyweds will opt for a budget honeymoon close to home. Check out photos of some other British royal weddings.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Peter Phillips -- son of Princess Anne, Queen Elizabeth II's only daughter -- married Canadian-born Autumn Kelly on May 17, 2008. The bride converted from Roman Catholicism to Anglicanism so that her husband would not have to renounce his rights to the throne. The couple recently welcomed their first child, a baby girl who is the queen's first great-grandchild.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Prince Charles became the first member of the royal family to have a civil ceremony when he married Camilla Parker Bowles on April 11, 2005. Camilla, now known as the Duchess of Cornwall, was divorced from her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles. The newlyweds are seen with their children. On the left are Prince Harry and Prince William. On the right are Laura Lopes and Tom Parker Bowles.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Sophie Rhys-Jones, a PR exec from a middle-class background, married Prince Edward on June 19, 1999. He is the queen's youngest son. Her Royal Highness the Countess of Wessex, as Sophie is now known, gave up her career. The Wessexes have two children, Lady Louise Windsor and James, Viscount Severn. Edward will eventually inherit his father's title as Duke of Edinburgh.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones married actor Daniel Chatto on July 14, 1994. She is the daughter of the queen's only sister, Princess Margaret, and the Earl of Snowdown. She is now known as Lady Sarah Chatto. The couple have two children, Samuel and Arthur.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
David, Viscount Linley, son of Princess Margaret and the Earl of Snowdown, married Serena Stanhope on Oct. 8, 1983. They have two children, Charles and Margarita Armstrong-Jones. Linley runs his own furniture-making company.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
The Church of England frowns on divorce, so Princess Anne married her second husband, Cmdr. Tim Laurence, in a Scottish church on Dec. 12, 1992. Anne, the queen's only daughter, is also known as the Princess Royal.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Prince Andrew, the queen's second son, married flame-haired Sarah Ferguson on July 23, 1986. The new Duke and Duchess of York had two children, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. But Sarah never adjusted to royal ways and caused scandal after scandal, most notably when she was photographed topless with her "financial adviser" sucking her toe. Andrew and Sarah divorced in 1996.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
It seemed straight out of a fairy tale when Prince Charles, 32-year-old heir to the British throne, married 20-year-old Lady Diana Spencer on July 29, 1981. Despite the births of Prince William and Prince Harry, the couple were very ill-suited. Diana bitterly claimed "there were three of us in this marriage" -- a reference to Camilla Parker Bowles. Charles and Diana separated in December 1992 and were divorced in August 1996. A year later, Diana was killed in car crash in Paris.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Princess Anne, the queen's daughter, married Capt. Mark Phillips, a former Olympic gold medal-winning horseman, on Nov. 14, 1973. They had two children, Peter and Zara Phillips, but divorced in 1992. Phillips fathered a daughter, Felicity, during an extramarital affair with New Zealander Heather Tonkin. In 1997, he married Sandy Pflueger. They have a daughter, Stephanie.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Add a comment
Did Sarah forget that little undercover tape that showed the world what a con artist she really is by selling access to her ex for a price? She has some nerve being upset. She really is delusional.
Reply
Fergie and Prince Andrew are not having a happy divorce! I can see why she would not be invited. The royal family is behaving like all families do with divorces setting up the family politics. Prince Andrew was chosen to be invited over Fergie, regardless of right or wrong.
Reply
PS The Obama's are not invited either because Mrs. Obama got very familiar with the Queen and hugged her, and Barack let the UK know how much he hated Winston Churchill by sending back Churchill gifts and momentos.
She tried to sell out her ex husband. She embarrased the family.
Reply
william afraid if he invites her she will drink up all the booze..
Reply
Sarah needs to prove herself, that she's cleaned up her act & will raise her & Andrew's daughters in a responsible way. She should not be surprised at not being invited. She should accept it graciously & stop whining. I'm on her side, but she's been acting so badly, no wonder the Royal Family don't want anything to do with her.
Reply
The Princessess Beatrice and Eugenie are grown. So therefore Sarah doesn't or can't prove anything by raising them: they've already been raised. As to whether she should have been invited, she said over a month ago she knew she wouldn't be and was going to be out of the country anyway. The Queen may be inviting people but she was given names by the happy couple, Kate's family, the Home office, etc etc. I doubt even Andrew wanted her there after the "I can sell you access to my ex husband" debacle, not because he may or may not be angry with her but because having her there would take the focus off who the day is supposed to be about: William and Kate
In these times, the very LAST thing I would ever want to do would be to marry into a so-called "royal family." Especially considering the excessive spectacle, throwing all that money around, in the face of the "subjects" who pretty much have none.
Reply
Honestly, I've thought the very same thing. It's very expensive to live in England regardless of all the social programs. The average person struggles and lives pretty modestly. I think William and Kate could have opted for a nice, but smaller church wedding and said they wanted to be more conservative out of concern for the economic situation in England. IMO, that would have made a statement and set well with the British people.
Cindy,
Be honest now. YOu would jump at the chance to marry into a royal family. You know that will never happen so you are down on the royal family.It is called jealousy and not a nice personal trait.
It should be for the couple. If they are close to Sarah then should invite. Didn't say if Sarah's daughters were invited?
After getting caught selling access to her ex..I don't think she should be included in royle family events. She broke the trust. I don't think she would, but she could take pictures and sell them.
Like Sarah..good luck!
Reply
I can't beleive that you people beleive this crap. In the regular news it stated that she did not except an invitation from Prince Andrew. She also stated thatshe would not of gone even if she did receive an invitation. It's always information from a close friend about another person and it must be true, lol.
Reply
I saw the video of her trying sell access to andrew, big mistake for her. If she is down on her luck which I can't understand she has no one to blame but herself. If she wants to go call Andrew and have him invite her not his mother. Besides technically William is Andrews nephew not hers, she is not blood. Just an ex spouse of royalty.
Reply
Undoubtedly Fergie would have been equipped with a hidden camera and already have a deal going to sell the tape. "Charlie" can be trusted to behave - his only thought will be whether Cammie is riding a white horse (he dreams alot). But that red-headed brother might be convinced by that red-headed older WO-MAN to be kissing some toes.
Reply
Why7 would she be so surprised after she offered "access to the royal family" for being paid off in return? I lost any respect for her then.
The real losers in this are her two daughters, who are cousins to Prince William, and Prince William himself and other members of the royal family who will not be able to see her daughters at this event. They are, after all, children of the royal family still.
Reply
Why would you want to go? I wouldn't be going to my ex's son's wedding (if i had an ex). That door is closed now. I really don't think her ex wants her there either. Who really wants to be hanging with thier ex husband and his family when you don't hang around them at all in the first place. And i don't think william would want to invite her since he really dosen't even hang around her, he did as a young boy because of diana but that was years ago. He was never a grown man hanging out with fergie.
Reply
So sad for her and her lovely daughters,no matter the crime, they will forever still be " FAMILY "
The snub to Sarah hurts many concerned and is uncalled for'
The So Called Family tried to snub Diana,the People refused to allow it,Diana was loved by "the People",thankfully some have a workable brain...........it just must be given a hard shake occasionally.............Life will go on......GOD'S Blessings to all concerned..............
Reply
OOps meant to say your ex's nephews wedding.
Reply
And the queen is sending out the invites??? Who's wedding is this anyway. As usual, shes sticking her big british nose in grandsons business. Once a control freak, always a control freak - glad I'm on the other side of the pond.
Reply
hey Anne-the Queen is THE Queen-a concept you clearly do not understand. The Queen is in charge of the Royal Family-she is THE QUEEN-get it-THE QUEEN invites people to Royal Functions SHE is IN CHARGE of