We're used to seeing Hugh Hefner surrounded by a bevy of beauties and old pictures of the Playboy mogul from 1966 show much of the same.Rarely seen photographs of Hef's early years, however, are a little different -- it seems back then, judging from the pics, he preferred brunettes.
Don't get us wrong, blondes are definitely represented. (And all of his recent girlfriends, including fiancee Crystal Harris, have been towheads.)
But in this photo of Hefner by the pool, brunettes clearly dominate.
So as we prepare to watch Hef get married again, take a walk down memory lane at his Chicago mansion. Check Out the Pics Below!










Add a comment
The girls were kinda pudgy back then.
Reply
"The girls were kinde pudgy back then." THANK GOD!!! They look like WOMEN, not girls.
No love, they were built like a woman should be built. No stick figures, a few curves but not too much....perfection!
ANG WHY SO HATEFUL? You must be a Christian. They weren't hurting you or anyone else.
So, you like the pre-teen boy body shape?
women then were not as fit as they are now. The one on the left evidently had the soft belly of a woman who has had a child and did not work out. Funny to see the big hair and the propped up boobs. Heff was a good looking dude. The women now are much prettier and more natural even though many of the boobs are silicone.
80 year old with 18 year old girls, and who knows how many have lied about their age and could be only 16?????
The girls had curves then...and hair on the rug.:)
Aw, you like boys?
"ANG WHY SO HATEFUL? You must be a Christian. They weren't hurting you or anyone else."
Pot calling the kettle black. Actually, you are simply a bigot. The person you are replying to simply made an observation. Yes, they are a little pudgy (relative to what we see today). There is nothing "hateful" about that. So really, you are just a hypocrite.
I was from that era, and no we were normal and natural and health wise in very good condition and even today. The girls today with all that silicone, and everything else they do to their bodies will not live nearly as long as we are and will have many health problems. The body was not intended to be done over as it is today, and it will have it's bad health effects, trust me.
Actually, Marilyn Monroe was a size 14, and the average size during the 60's was 12 or 14. Now it's much smaller - it has to do with the media hype brainwashing the public into accepting what is the flavor of the day. A healthy average woman is a size 12, or even a little larger. It's not what's accepted now, but there it is.
That's the way women are supposed to look! It's nice to see reality instead of fiction.
You can see that women were built like women, not little boys
"Actually, Marilyn Monroe was a size 14, and the average size during the 60's was 12 or 14. Now it's much smaller - it has to do with the media hype brainwashing the public into accepting what is the flavor of the day. A healthy average woman is a size 12, or even a little larger. It's not what's accepted now, but there it is."
Just to point this out, a size 14 in the 60s was the equivalent of a 6-8 today. Also, most of what you see today is photoshopped - a few helpful facts to throw in the ring. Lastly, I love how heated and silly some of these arguments are getting. Keep up the good work; it makes for an entertaining read ;)
Yes, pudgy if you will BUT they were all REAL and natural . . . no plastic.
You aren't "pudgy" just because you don't look like a 14 year old BOY! I never met a guy who didn't want curves on a woman.
You must mean the girls were NORMAL back then, right?
I agree.Just like today but its even worse.
I agree.Now females (and men too) are much fatter.Its hard to find a woman who is not fat these days. You can call fat curvy all you want its still fat.
CHECK OUT ALL THE GOLDIGGING LOSERS GATHERED ARROUND THIS PATHETIC SINNER , YOU MEAN TO TELL ME THAT NICE LADIES REALLY LOVED THIS PIPE SMOKING * RICH MAN ,,,, TRUE LOVE
Reply