We're used to seeing Hugh Hefner surrounded by a bevy of beauties and old pictures of the Playboy mogul from 1966 show much of the same.Rarely seen photographs of Hef's early years, however, are a little different -- it seems back then, judging from the pics, he preferred brunettes.
Don't get us wrong, blondes are definitely represented. (And all of his recent girlfriends, including fiancee Crystal Harris, have been towheads.)
But in this photo of Hefner by the pool, brunettes clearly dominate.
So as we prepare to watch Hef get married again, take a walk down memory lane at his Chicago mansion. Check Out the Pics Below!








Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
The List #0147: Escape a Car Underwater
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
H&M's Plus-Size Model Jennie Runk Says She Chose To Gain Weight
Okla. Sheriff's Deputy Finds Dog Guarding Body Buried Under Destroyed Home
Reptiles Make Home in UK Man's Cable Box
Okla. School Survivor: Teacher 'Saved Our Lives'
Xbox One event roundup: Microsoft reveals its next-gen gaming console


Add a comment
"The women are much prettier and more natural, even though many of the boobs are silicone." Really? Alumette, do you know what an oxymoron is? Maybe look it up, sweetie.
Reply
I know that he is not with those women now.
Reply
I love the big hair!
Reply
Hef's smart. Hef built an empire from nothing. Nonetheless, he's still a schmuck.
Reply
ON THE HOLE, HUGH PREFERRED BLONDES. . .
Reply
on the hole--he preferred shaved haaaaa
Heff wasn't always a shallow fool for hair color. Put a blonde wig on any ugly looking woman and she'll be call a blonde beauty it's amazing how hair color can make a man over look uglyness.
Reply
Does anyone else think the last picture looks a lot like Dr. Oz?
Reply
“Money talks”….
Trashy W….n and LEGAL Polygamist?..!!!
Reply
I love how they are being called "pudgy" No they are normal women, not over done by plastic surgery and starvation
Reply
The curtains mathced the rugs !
Reply
The reason Playboy is not doing as well know is that they have abandoned the original concept which was the "girl next door." Frankly there is not a bleached blonde next door with fake boobs and with shaved and airbrushed private areas with tatoos and belly rings. The photos now are for the most part what females think men want to see and they are wrong. The pictures are taken and selected by mostly female photograhers and editors so they are publishing what females "think" men like. To be successful they need to go back to the orginal concept use male photographers and editors and have real girls without fake and airbrushed body parts.
Reply
It's interesting to see this perspective from the men in here. I have to agree - I lived thru the sixties, and remember well the impact Playboy had on the guys (and girls) I knew. Anyone who's gone to a Playboy Club during that time period remembers it well, I'm sure.
Really, you need to check out Playboy's Australian edition. It's more of an old school Playboy format. Like you got here in the sixties. Lieko English, Victoria Principal ect. The concept is a little older, rounder fuller, mature women, full landing strip, hot hot chicks.
Most women back in the old days were heterosexual, but, thanks to the 1960s/1970s homosexual militia's disinformation that 10 % of the US population were gay at the time, but it was not true. Had we known their intention, then the gay rights would have never flourished and that many lesbians today would have been remained heterosexual. By the way, I think today our nation may be 10% gay.
Reply
10%? Are you kidding, it seems to be more like 30% minimum, its disgusting.
Oh, look at his nose, it looks like a beak! If he were an animal, he would be a bird of prey, like the distinct bald eagle! Terrible face, and those sunken cheeks. He can't even walk, maybe he has some sort of inflammatory desease! Hee hee.
Reply
He is a pervert
Reply
Call him what you want to? All those girls are seeking him out so whatever?
I was an invited guest at the Playboy Club in Boston back in the 60's and yes, the woman were very natural and gorgeous. Their size was about a 6 or 8 if that, not skinny and not fat, and small wastes. Not anorexic like today, nor were they muscularly over done. They were feminine. It was a different era.
Reply