Royal Weddings Through the Years
Prince William and Kate Middleton will marry on April 29 at Westminster Abbey. Catherine, as she is now known, has not yet revealed who will design her wedding dress, but William is expected to follow royal tradition and wear a military uniform. Since so many Britons are going through economic hard times, there's talk the royal newlyweds will opt for a budget honeymoon close to home. Check out photos of some other British royal weddings.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Peter Phillips -- son of Princess Anne, Queen Elizabeth II's only daughter -- married Canadian-born Autumn Kelly on May 17, 2008. The bride converted from Roman Catholicism to Anglicanism so that her husband would not have to renounce his rights to the throne. On Dec. 29, 2010, the couple welcomed their first child, a baby girl named Savannah who is the queen's first great-grandchild.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Prince Charles became the first member of the royal family to have a civil ceremony when he married Camilla Parker Bowles on April 11, 2005. Camilla, now known as the Duchess of Cornwall, was divorced from her first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles. The newlyweds are seen with their children. On the left are Prince Harry and Prince William. On the right are Laura Lopes and Tom Parker Bowles.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Sophie Rhys-Jones, a PR exec from a middle-class background, married Prince Edward on June 19, 1999. He is the queen's youngest son. Her Royal Highness the Countess of Wessex, as Sophie is now known, gave up her career. The Wessexes have two children, Lady Louise Windsor and James, Viscount Severn. Edward will eventually inherit his father's title as Duke of Edinburgh.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones married actor Daniel Chatto on July 14, 1994. She is the daughter of the queen's only sister, Princess Margaret, and the Earl of Snowdown. She is now known as Lady Sarah Chatto. The couple have two children, Samuel and Arthur.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
David, Viscount Linley, son of Princess Margaret and the Earl of Snowdown, married Serena Stanhope on Oct. 8, 1983. They have two children, Charles and Margarita Armstrong-Jones. Linley runs his own furniture-making company.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
The Church of England frowns on divorce, so Princess Anne married her second husband, Cmdr. Tim Laurence, in a Scottish church on Dec. 12, 1992. Anne, the queen's only daughter, is also known as the Princess Royal.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Prince Andrew, the queen's second son, married flame-haired Sarah Ferguson on July 23, 1986. The new Duke and Duchess of York had two children, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie. But Sarah never adjusted to royal ways and caused scandal after scandal, most notably when she was photographed topless with her "financial adviser" sucking her toe. Andrew and Sarah divorced in 1996.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
It seemed straight out of a fairy tale when Prince Charles, 32-year-old heir to the British throne, married 20-year-old Lady Diana Spencer on July 29, 1981. Despite the births of Prince William and Prince Harry, the couple were very ill-suited. Diana bitterly claimed "there were three of us in this marriage" -- a reference to Camilla Parker Bowles. Charles and Diana separated in December 1992 and were divorced in August 1996. A year later, Diana was killed in car crash in Paris.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Princess Anne, the queen's daughter, married Capt. Mark Phillips, a former Olympic gold medal-winning horseman, on Nov. 14, 1973. They had two children, Peter and Zara Phillips, but divorced in 1992. Phillips fathered a daughter, Felicity, during an extramarital affair with New Zealander Heather Tonkin. In 1997, he married Sandy Pflueger. They have a daughter, Stephanie.
Royal Weddings Through the Years
Add a comment
Ok, just get married so the media will shut up about this wedding. Yes, I wish them the best but seriously, we don't need to hear about them every 5 minutes.
Reply
Amen, Ted. I thought I was the only one who was tired of hearing about this wedding. It has been ongoing on every news show, talk show and any other show you can think of. I am sick, sick, sick of hearing about it and will be glad when the wedding is over (although we will probably be hearing about the wedding for two weeks after). Ugghh!!!
==
HER parents wedding" !!! She's marrying royalty for chrissakes......
=:)
=:(
I feel the same way. I do not care that much about the wedding either.
So Will and Kate's big week is nothing like his parents. The same for their wedding too.
believe you will love it.
====( w w w )( b2b jordans )( c o m )
BEST QUALITY GUARANTEE!!
There are many fashion clothes high-heeled shoes
I think it would be lovely if the Queen would give William (and she is within her rights as the reigning sovereign to do so) the throne on his wedding day, thereby eliminating Charles from the picture. The coronation could follow soon after, and we'd be done all the royal goings-on for a good while...
Reply
I agree, Charles dogged William's mother out, he knew he did not love her from the beginning, she was just a breeding heifer for him, He treated her so bad running around with Camilla the Gorilla.
I'm sure it's more "it's nothing like HER parents wedding" !!! She's marrying royalty for chrissakes......
Reply
I don't think Diana would have cared if their wedding was jeans and jumpers at the magistrates office, if she could have had the happy marriage she was hoping for, or the happy family she had hoped to give her sons. People are so caught up in the royal trappings, that they forget these are actual people getting married, not abstract ideas. William and Kate seem to be on much better footing for a happy marriage than Charles and poor Diana were, largely through Charles' fault. The Middletons, by all accounts, seem to be a happily married couple, and a much better example for the newlyweds.
I just hope they have a happy marriage, like Kate's parents seem to have. They are real people, even though he is a prince, and they are entitled to happiness and privacy. God bless them.
Reply
I totally agree with you.
Wish them well and know Diana is smiling from above and knows that they will be happy as William truly loves Kate.
If Charles had had the cajones to marry Camilla when they were both young and single instead of wimping out, none of this would have happened. Kate is beautiful and stylish and I dread the press hounding her every move. I wish them both well.
Reply
Don't think Charles should have the throne after the way he behaved, who wants Camilla as queen anyway, give it to William!
Reply
Why doesn't everyone just leave them alone. Kate is not Diana, she is her own person. The press and all those know it alls in England should leave them alone. Their marriage is one of love. The couple will have enough problems with dealing with the dysfunctional royal family and their hanger ons. I wish them luck and happiness
Reply
Though I am already tired of all of the constant media coverage leading up to the royal wedding, I do still have faith in William and Kate as a couple. Though the press was clearly a major factor of Diana and Charles' downfall and even Diana's death, I feel that Kate and William have learned from that and are willing to maintain a strong front against the media. Kate is obviously older than Diana was during her marriage, and she is therefore much more mature. On top of that, William and Kate are both strong, independent individuals on their own, which could not necessarily have been said about Diana prior to her royal wedding. With this, they have both taken time to realize their own goals in life and see that they truly involve one another as equal contributers to the their relationship. Although they will have constant media attention and pressure, I really do have faith that William and Kate will last as a royal couple.
Reply
charles is a tool
Reply
I will never stop believing that it was a set up murder of the princess.
Reply
"The family are famously functional in marked contrast to William's unhappy background."
Seriously? How unhappy could he have possibly been?
Reply
I wouldn't doubt it!
Of course Kate is confident!!! They've been living together for years. SHE knows what SHE's getting under the covers, and he cared enough about her to fully prepare her for the scrutiny. They'll be fine. Enough already....
Reply