First Look! Jane Krakowski's Chubby-Cheeked Son [Photo]

By Katelyn Mullen Posted May 6th 2011 07:00PM

Here's a first look at Jane Krakowski's little bundle of joy!

The '30 Rock' star gave birth to Bennett Godley on April 13, and was spotted yesterday, taking the newborn for a stroll in New York City. The 3-week-old little guy looks like his Tony Award winner mommy, with some extra cute chubby cheeks!

Krakowski, and fiancé Robert Godley, let the world know they were expecting when the funny gal was photographed back in January wearing her swimsuit, with a noticeable baby bump. It was only a year earlier that Krakowski announced she and Godley were engaged, but still have yet to set a date.

Tags: celebrity babies, jane krakowski

Comments

(21)

Friday 06 May

By Ana

Highest Rank Vote down Vote up Report this

He is just adorable. He doesn't even look like he is three weeks old!

By DIDIANSKI

LOVE A LITTLE BABY WITH THE CHUBBY FACTOR!

By rhgfd

Low Ranked Vote down Vote up Report this

believe you will love it.

====( w w w )( jordans forking )( c o m )

BEST QUALITY GUARANTEE!!

By Mary

What a cutie.

By Sue

cute cute cute!

By Emmaline

Finally, a cute Hollywood baby! He's a little dumpling. Bet he makes his grandmas happy. Jane, hurry up and have another one. You guys make beautiful babies!

By uawildcat

Vote down Vote up Report this

What a punim!

By Ro

That baby doesn't look like he's only 3 weeks old. I think it's someone else's kid and they thought it may be Janes's. After all, I don't see Jane holding the baby. There are two seperate pics of Jane and the baby.

By nanny

High Rank Vote down Vote up Report this

omg what a doll......3 weeks old!!! this boy's bionic

By baba

Can anyone say "girl"? Pink clothes? Pink dotted blanket? Adorable, but not her baby.

yeah i think she could afford a BLUE nightgown. she prob doesn't have to cross dress the little tyke

By CiCi

The baby in the picture is not 3weeks old and definitely a girl. Look at all the pink. The baby is beautiful but not her baby.

By sondbr

I don't believe that's her 3 WEEK old baby. My grandson is 4 MONTHS and he looks like that. There is no way the baby in the picture is 3 wks. unless she weighed about 10#+ and, still, would have a newborn look.

By Tasha

beautiful baby and mommy

By Victoria

Definitely not 3 weeks... when my baby was 4 months old he looked like that! And it definitely looks like a little girl, not a boy. I think they confused another baby with hers!

By crizz

Cute! But totally not her baby. As others have said, it's dressed like a girl. AND, her face is too developed to be just 3 weeks old. That baby looks 3 or 4 months old in the face.

By Jane

That baby looks older than 3 weeks. Plus, it looks like he's/she's wearing pink.

By kathy

While that is an adorable baby....I do not think it is Jane's SON. That certainly looks like a little girl(pink is a huge clue)and the face is too mature and alert to be a three-week old. That very cute baby is at least 9weeks old....if not older.

By Cindy and Todd

Sorry, that is not a 3-week old baby. They don't smile until they are at least 6 weeks. This baby looks to be around 4 months old.

Sunday 08 May

By John

Mothers are now painting their little boys toenails and dressing them in pink.

Page 1 of 2