Kendra Wilkinson Drops Down to a Size Zero

By Katelyn Mullen Posted May 25th 2011 06:10AM

Kendra Wilkinson may not be going home with the highly sought 'Dancing With the Stars' trophy, but she isn't really all that bothered by it. She got so much more out of her time on the hit show -- she got her old body back.

The former Playboy Playmate posed in bikini during her photo shoot with Life & Style, showing off her newly tiny body. She revealed, "I was a size 2 or 4 before 'Dancing With the Stars' and now I'm a size 0. My waist is still shrinking! When you work out, you produce so much lactic acid, so my body always looks thicker and more muscular. Now that I've had a couple of weeks off, my body is fuller and looks better. I hope I'll look like this forever. But to be honest, I will never be satisfied!"

Wilkinson was very open about her struggle to lose the 60 lbs she gained while pregnant with son Hank and her stint on 'Dancing With the Stars' gave her that final boost to drop the excess weight. Returning to her former size isn't going to stop her from trying for baby number 2 with hubby Hank Baskett.

"Hank loves my new body," Kendra dishes. "He's ready [for another baby], but we're just having fun being young parents to Hank for now," she adds. "But we are having great sex! We're in the crazy-sex stage. Since 'Dancing With the Stars,' I want to get into all the skimpy lingerie!"

"I feel like I look so much better than I used to," she says, "I'm worried about gaining the weight back, but motherhood is worth it." If she does get pregnant, she says she will be more prepared this time. "I'm determined to be healthier and treat my body better."

For more on Kendra's weight loss and baby plans, pick up the latest issue of Life & Style, on newsstands now.

Tags: Dancing With the Stars, Kendra Wilkinson

Comments

(127)

Wednesday 25 May

By K

High Rank Vote down Vote up Report this

Kirstie has always lied about her weight. I remember she said she was at 180 pounds once, when she was really like 250 or more. She is a big woman, with tree trunk legs. Its great shes losing weight, but she is not that size. She looks like a size 22 or more. We are not stupid.

By Rae

Vote down Vote up Report this

Thats gross, im only 5'1 amd im not a zero. And you know what, im happy im not skeletor. Just saying...

By Frances

Marilyn Monroe was NOT a size 14 people. She was larger than models these days but she was not as big as a 14. I'm naturally very small and while Kendra does look small in that photo I don't see her fitting into any of my jeans (size 00 to MAYBE a 1 depending on the brand). I'd say she's got to be a 2 or higher.

By Sheila

When self worth is measured by waist size there's a lot more going on than "dieting". Kendra needs some serious psychological help.

By pam

Oink, no matter what size it is. Used merchandise...

By Beth

Kirstie Alley is probably a size 20 easy. WHICH IS A SIZE 4.....in Lane Bryant or Torrid. A Size 4 in Lane Bryant or Torrid is a 4X. Who said she was a size 4?

By john stickney

Hey Kendra! EAT SOMETHING!!!! I've seen Ethiopians that look better.

By fred

Yeah, right. Who does she think she's kidding? That silicone chest needs at least a size 10 and the rest of her body is probably an 8.

By jami

Kendra looks good but I don't understand why everyone is so hung up on the numbers. She is not a size 0 . I am a weight loss consultant and have been a size 2 and she isn't a 0 . She doesn't have the frame to be a size 0 and that's ok . As long as you feel good and can do everything you want to do , size is like age ...just a number.

By Lynn

In LA where the designers can "sew" in any # a celebrity wants her size to be, this claim is certainly believable by both Kendra & Kirstie. Even though I prefer Kirstie, I doubt her size claim. Kendra probably is a size 0. Remember each clothes brand size runs differently. Also, the fabric stretch matters. I am 55 years old with 3 kids ranging in ages 30-20. I wear a size OO-2. I am 5'2"/weigh 102 lbs, with a small frame. My BMI is 18.2 (normal range). I do not look anorexic or even skinny-scary...just thin. Each person is different and should not feel judged by their size.

By malibubeach7777

Mudshark that will burn in hell .

By junelee

I feel sorry for her when she reaches the point in her life ( as we all will ) when she realizes that her worth is not in her body.

By Jamie

Girl friend must be starving herself to death. She looks hungry and tired from not eating and trying to fit into a size zero. Good luck sista!!

Thursday 26 May

By Nesa

Vickie...who cares if your niece is a size 0..people carry their weight differently...Kendra always keeps it real which is what people like about her. Her waist is tiny..I believe she's the size she says she is. I'm a size 7 and when I tell other women that they think I'm lying and that I'm a smaller size (who would lie about that? smh..doesn't make sense)the fact is..your niece can be be super skinny with no muscle tone and be a size 0 and Kendra is toned size 0. Not every size 0 person looks the same

By tdo

unfortunately, she still talks.

By Melissa

A size zero is NOT a "reasonable weight"... it's underweight. And check this - boobs are made of FAT... no body fat means no boobs. No way a woman can have so little body fat and still be packing a pair of double D's, unless they're fake. And william - I agree with Katie ^^ Kirstie amay be fat but she can diet... you will always be a disgusting judgemental slug.

By Rob

To match her I.Q.

By john

i dont think she ever really gained wait but now she just looks even more amazingly sexy

By jstatic666

Good thing her body's hot....takes the attention off her horse face.

By rodney

Kendra is a ditsy ho. dumber than a box of rocks. Why do you think Hef got rid of her? And who really cares what size she is . The show is dancing with the stars and she is not a star!! Kristie is.

Page 6 of 7