No Profile Found

Recent Comments:

Kate Middleton & 10 Other Commoners on the Throne {Lemondrop}

Jun 29th 2011 7:06PM

TO BE NOBLE IS A HIGH MONARCHY OR LOW MONARCHY OF SCHLOR PRESTIGUE,NOT A COMMAN WORKINGCLASS AS YOU SAID IN A PREVOUS COMMENT.HRH LADY DIANA SPENCER ROYAL BLOOD LEADS TO THE ROMANOV AND GERMAN ARISTOCRATICS NOT WORKINGCLASS MEN OR WOMAN OF LOW RANK. TO BE A BASTARD ISN'T CONSIDERED A ROYAL PRESTIGE.LADY DIANA IS BORN OF A ROYAL MOTHER WHO IS ROYAL AND A FATHER WHO IS ROYAL BIRTH AND PERSTIGE TO THE CROWN.IF THEY WOULD STOP GIVEN NON ROYAL THE SAME CONSIDERATION,OF FULL ROYALS THERE WOULDN'T BE CONFUSION ON THE LAWS AND RIGHTS THAT GO WITH THE TERMS CONSORT. CONSORT IS NOT THE RIGHTS OF A WORKINGCLASS IDEALER LOOKING TO BE PRINCESS OR QUEEN ,BECAUSE,IT WILL NEVER BE CONSORT MARRIAGE TO BE CROWN RULERS OR MAINTAIN ,ESPECIAL NOW SINCE THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND IS NOT GOING TO MAKE KATE OR CAMILLA RULER OF THE CROWN.IT WOULD TAKE HRH PRINCE HARRY TO MARRY VIRGIN ROYAL MONARCHY TO PRODUCE A FUTURE KING ,KING TITLE FOR HIMSELF AS FOR HIS ROYAL BRIDE QUEEN STANDING WITH HIM TO RULE ,THEN ENGLAND WOULD HAVE IT'S RULING MONARCHY,NOT KATE OR CAMILLA WILL RULE OR BRING THE TITLE BUMP UP LIKE HRH LADY SPENCER DID FOR THEN HRH PRINCE CHARLES,HE HAD TO MARRY VIRGIN ,BLUEBLOOD BIRTH MONARCHY,WITHOUT A PAST HISTORY OF A SLUE OF BOYSFRIENDS.

Kate Middleton & 10 Other Commoners on the Throne {Lemondrop}

Jun 29th 2011 6:55PM

CHARLES CANNOT EVER RULE WITH CAMILLA BOWELS AS HIS WIFE ,THUS THE TRH CHARLES AND CONSORT CAMILLA BOWELS,AND DIVIOCE ..TRH WILLIAM AND CONSORT KATE MIDDLETON CATAGORIZE IN THE SAME FORMATION AND WILL NOT RULE OR GIVE A FUTURE HEIR TO THE CROWN.WALLACE SIMPSON IN THE HISTORY TERMS OF WHO SHE IS ,WILL BE KNOWN AS CONSORT WALLACE SIMPSON TO EDWARD,TRH EDWARD.CLEARLY THEY WILL NOT BE GIVEN A TERM OF ROYALTY BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT BORN ROYALTY,HRH PRINCESS DIANA WAS AND WAS GIVEN RIGHTS ,THESE CONSORTS WILL NEVER HAVE....

Kate Middleton & 10 Other Commoners on the Throne {Lemondrop}

Jun 29th 2011 6:48PM

HRH Lady DIANA SPENCER was not commoner like the reporter of the 1980's mis- informed on the term,because this reporter cannot correctly define born monarchy from workingclass birth women and men.HRH LADY DIANA IS NOT BORN A COMMONER TO EQUAL THE MEANING OF WHAT KATE AND CAMILLA ARE. KATE NOT ONCE OF OF ROYAL BLOOD TO ENSURE A ROYAL LEGAGCY TO THE THRONE.CAMILLA TIES ARE AUNT WHO WERE WHORE ,THEY DID NOT GIVE BIRTH TO A BLOOD MONARCHY THUS SHE IS WHAT KATE MIDDLETON IS NOT ONE OUNCE OF MONARCHY IN HER BLOOD,TO BE A STEP-CHILD OF A MONARCHY IS NOT DNA RELATED TO THE CROWN.

Sites We Love